Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: VideoTech Short Film/Trailer rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
VideoTech Short Film/Trailer
Movie Trailer
Rubric Code:
M4A8X8
By
PMeunier
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Vocational
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
VideoTech II Film
Unsatisfactory
25 pts
Basic
50 pts
Proficient
80 pts
Distinguished
100 pts
Camera Work
Unsatisfactory
Few shots are steady or lit. Shot composition is off. Very minimal tripod usage; lots of handheld video. There is almost no shot variety and sequencing.
Basic
Many shots are steady, well composed and lit well. A tripod was used but there is a lot of handheld work. There is little shot variety and sequencing.
Proficient
Most shots are steady, well composed and well lit. A tripod was used and there is little handheld work. There is some shot variety and sequencing.
Distinguished
All shots are steady, well composed and well lit. A tripod was extensively used and there is very little handheld work. There is a lot of shot variety and sequencing.
Interviews/Audio
Unsatisfactory
There is no interview sound or it is overrun by ambient noise. There is no Nat sound. Soundbites are strung together. There is little to no narration.
Basic
The interview subject is not mic'd and background noise interferes with the interview sound. Nat sound changes from shot to shot. Narration is sporadic and unintelligible or overdriven in parts.
Proficient
The interview subject is mic'd and sound is generally clear but may be too high or too low at times. Nat sound is used sparingly but is not distracting when used. Narration needs leveled or balanced.
Distinguished
The interview subject is mic'd and audio is clear, Nat sound is not competing. Sound levels are not overmodulated or peaking. Sound is woven together and does not change with each piece of video. Narration is clean and audible.
Editing/Effects
Unsatisfactory
There is ittle attention to detail. Almost no special effects were attempted. There are flashframes or jumpcuts. Editing distracts from the film.
Basic
Some attention is paid to detail in transitions and shot choice. There are some special effects but overall they do little to enhance the film. There are some flashframes or jumpcuts. Editing distracts from the film
Proficient
Good attention to detail in transitions and shot flow. Some effort was put into using special effects . There are no flashframes or jumpcuts. Editing is almost seamless.
Distinguished
Excellent attention to detail in transitions and shot flow. Lots of effort was put into using special effects to enhance the film. There are no flashframes or jumpcuts. Editing is seamless.
Graphics/Titles
Unsatisfactory
Few to no graphics are used. There are several misspellings and grammatical errors. The video is missing a title slate and closing credits as well as lower third graphics introducing the people speaking.
Basic
Graphics that correlate and makes sense in context are used. They, sort of, add to the trailer's story. Graphics are legible with a couple of minor errors. One or more of the following may be missing; a title slate, closing credits as well as lower third graphics introducing the people speaking.
Proficient
Graphics that correlate and makes sense in context are used. They, mostly, add to the trailer's story. Graphics are easy to read and utilize correct grammar and spelling with only one error. There's a title slate and closing credits as well as lower third graphics introducing the people speaking.
Distinguished
Excellent graphics that correlate and makes sense in context, adding to the trailer's story. Graphics are easy to read and utilize correct grammar and spelling every time. There's a title slate and closing credits as well as lower third graphics introducing the people speaking.
Time
Unsatisfactory
Video is shorter than the 2-minute requirement by more than 30-seconds.
Basic
Video is shorter than the 2-minute requirement by 30-seconds or less.
Proficient
Video is just shy of 2-minutes long, not including credits.
Distinguished
Video is 2-minutes or longer. Not including credits.
Overall Effort
Unsatisfactory
Some of the group participated and shared in the whole creation process. The group had to be redirected and put back on task multiple times.
Basic
Part of the group participated and shared in parts of the creation process. Group members had to be redirected and put back on task more than once.
Proficient
Most of the group participated and shared in the whole creation process. No one had to be redirected and put back on task just once.
Distinguished
The entire group participated and shared in the whole creation process. No one had to be redirected and put back on task.
Subjects:
English
Vocational
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.