Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Social Critique / Persuasive Editorial rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Social Critique / Persuasive Editorial
Social Critique / Persuasive Editorial
Rubric Code:
M38B2B
By
Katie_Erickson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Social Critique/Persuasive Editoria
100 %
Exceeds Standard
100 pts
At Standard
92 pts
Progress Toward Standard
84 pts
Does Not Meet Standard
76 pts
Thesis, Purpose, and Significance
20 %
Exceeds Standard
Thesis is not only argumentative, but is also "surprising" or "risky," responds to assignment clearly and reflects author's purpose.
At Standard
Thesis is argumentative, responds to assignment clearly and reflects author's purpose
Essay's purpose is clear, but could use a bit more originality and independent thought.
Progress Toward Standard
Thesis is argumentative, but could respond to assignment and reflect author's purpose more clearly
Essay's purpose is somewhat clear, but lacks orginality and independent thought
Author gives reader some sense of the significance of the problem addressed
Does Not Meet Standard
Thesis not argumentative and does not respond to assignment or reflect author's purpose clearly
Essay's purpose is unclear
Significance of the problem addressed not given clearly
Argumentation/Rhetorical Strategies
20 %
Exceeds Standard
Claims and ideas are developed logically and thoroughly, and are supported through relevant evidence and sound, thorough reasoning
Clear and effective use of key rhetorical strategies - logos, ethos, and pathos
Author acknowledges multiple viewpoints and anticipates objections effectively
At Standard
claims and ideas are developed logically, and are supported with evidence and sound reasoning
Use of key rhetorical strategies - logos, ethos, and pathos - evident
Author anticipates some objections to his/her own position effectively
Progress Toward Standard
Claims and ideas are developed somewhat logically with some support/evidence/reasoning
Use of key rhetorical strategies -logos, ethos, and pathos - evident, but somewhat unclear
Author anticipates some objections, but somewhat unclearly and ineffectively
Does Not Meet Standard
Claims and ideas are underdeveloped and unsupported
Very little use of key rhetorical strategies - logos, ethos, and pathos
Author does not anticipate objections or ackknowledge other viewpoints
Source Analysis and Usage
20 %
Exceeds Standard
Author accurately and thoroughly summarizes or parahrases sources used
Author demonstrates ability to interpret sources accurately and analytically
Sources are synthesized with one another and with ideas of author thoroughly and effectively
At Standard
Author accurately summarizes or paraphrases sources used
Author's interpretation of sources is accurate and somewhat analytical
Sources are synthesized with one another and with ideas of the author to some extent
Progress Toward Standard
Author summarizes or paraphrases some, but not all, sources used
Author's interpretation of sources is fairly accurate, but could be more analytical
Sources are somewhat synthesized with one another and with the ideas of the author
Does Not Meet Standard
Author's summaries of sources are inadequate or inaccurate
Author's interpretation of sources is inaccurate and not analytical
Sources are not synthesized with one another and with the author's ideas
Style and Voice
15 %
Exceeds Standard
Style and voice are not only appropriate to the given audience, purpose, genre, and claims, but also showoriginality and creativity
Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied throughout essay
Sentences are clear, active, and to the point
At Standard
Style and voice approrpiate to the given audience, prupose, genre, and claims
Word choice is specific and purposefulo, and somewhat varied throughout essay
Sentences are mostly clear, active, and to the point
Progress Toward Standard
Style and voice are, at times, appropriate to given audience, purpose, genre, and claims
Word choice is often unspecific, genreic, redundant, and cliche
Sentences are somewhat unclear; excessive use of passive voice
Does Not Meet Standard
Style and voice inappropriate or do not address given audience, purpose, etc.
Word choice is excessively redundant, cliche, and unspecific
Presentation & Organization
25 %
Exceeds Standard
Topic sentences identify paragraphs' purposes, refelct their content and contribute to overall unity of essay
Transitions indicate relationships between not only paragraphs, but also ideas
Overall organization of paragraphs is logical and purposeful
The essay is free from grammatical and mechanical errors.
At Standard
Topic sentences reflect most paragraph content but may not contribute to overall unity of essay
Transitions indicate relationships between paragraphs
Overall organization of paragraphs is mostly logical and purposeful
Grammatical or mechanical errors exist, but not enough to distract from reading
Progress Toward Standard
Topic sentences do not consistently reflect paragraph content
Transitions sometimes do not indicate relationships between paragraphs
Organization of paragraphs is sometimes logical, but sometimes illogical and somewhat distracting
Grammatical or mechanical errors distract somewhat from reading
Does Not Meet Standard
Topic sentences unclear or non-existent
Transitions fail to indicate relationships between paragraphs
Organization of paragraphs illogical and distracting
Essay has excessive grammatical and mechanical erros that hinder readability substantially
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.