Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Analysis Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Analysis Paper
Writing Response
Rubric Code:
M36WB3
By
summergrl0410
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Analysis
Poor
5 pts
Fair
6 pts
Target
8 pts
Mechanics
Poor
6 or more grammatical errors
Fair
4-5 grammatical errors
Target
Less than 3 grammatical errors.
MLA
Poor
paper is not in 12pt font, double-spaced, and with appropriate heading
Fair
paper is partially in MLA format but is missing a component of correct formatting
Target
paper is correctly formatted
Thesis
Poor
Thesis is not provided or is weak
Fair
Thesis needs improvement.
Target
Paper contains a strong thesis, which provides a statement about the main idea of the "The Lottery" or "Harrison Bergeron"
Introductory Paragraph
Poor
Opening paragraph does not use an attention grabber or provide sufficent background info
Fair
Intro needs to be improved to better explain the story or needs an opening sentence to catch readers' attention
Target
Paragraph contains an attention grabber and introduces the background of the story
Government
Poor
Evidence and details are weak or not provided
Fair
Evidence and details provide some support for thesis, but more examples are needed.
Target
Sufficent examples are provided to show how government plays a role in the story.
Individuality
Poor
Evidence and details are weak or not provided
Fair
Evidence and details provide some support for thesis, but more examples are needed.
Target
Sufficent examples are provided to show how individuality is affected in the story.
Freedom
Poor
Evidence and details are weak or not provided
Fair
Evidence and details provide some support for thesis, but more examples are needed.
Target
Sufficent examples are provided to show how individuality is affected in the story.
Conclusion
Poor
Conclusion is short and does not seek to answer the question of author intent or what can be learned from the story.
Fair
Conclusion needs to provide further explanation of the author's intent and student's reflection about the story.
Target
Conclusion provides a reflection on why the author might have written the story and also what the audience can learn from reading the story.
Subjects:
English
Humanities
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.