Skip to main content

iRubric: Statistics Survey Project Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Statistics Survey Project Rubric Statistics Survey Project Rubric Statistics Survey Project Rubric Code: M36AB9 By CathyZill Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Math Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Survey Project
	Not Acceptable 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Topic /Question	Not Acceptable Neither topic/question nor background is not stated.	Poor Both the topic/questions and the background provided are flawed in at least one area. OR Either topic/question or background is missing.	Fair The topic/question is flawed in either one of the areas: clearly stated or appropriateness for an abservational study. OR The background provided fails to provide support to this topic/question or is irrelevent to student's lives.	Good The topic/question selected is clearly stated and is appropriate for an observational study. The background provided gives adequate motivation for the group's choice of this topic/question and is somewhat relevent to student's lives.	Excellent The topice/question selected is clearly stated and is appropriate for an observational study. The background provided gives strong motivation for the group's choice of this topic/questions and its relevence to student's lives.
Methodology-Sampling Procedure	Not Acceptable The sampling procedure is weak in all areas and there is noticeable bias in the sample. OR Sampling procedure is is missing from report.	Poor The sampling procedure is weak in all areas. OR There is noticeable bias in the sample.	Fair The sampling procedure is weak in two of the following areas: appropriateness, description, or implementation. OR There is evidence of some bias in the sample.	Good The sampling procedure is weak in one of the following areas: appropriateness, description, or implementation. No evidence of bias is present	Excellent The sampling procedure is appropriate for the selected topic/question, is described accurately and completely, and is implemented according to the stated plan. No evidence of bias is present.
Methodolgy-Randomization	Not Acceptable The randomization is flawed in all three area - labeling, number selection , and results OR Method is missing from report.	Poor There is some flaw in the randomization procedure itself. Some aspect of the randomization-labeling, number selction, or results is completely correct.	Fair The randomization process includes all three components listed at the right but the randomization process does not match the chosen sampling procedure. OR The randomization process matches the chosen sampling procedure, but the clarity of communication would prevent easy replication of this randomization, in spite of it being correctly designed and implemented.	Good The randomization process includes all three components listed at the right. However, clarity of communication would prevent easy replication of thei randomization. The randomization process matches the chosen sampling procedure.	Excellent The randomization process includes a clear and correct labeling of subjects, a description of the number selection process (random number table or calculator), and the results of the randomization (i.e. the numbers and subjects chosen). In addition the randomization process matches the chosen sampling procedure.
The Survey and Questions	Not Acceptable Survey questions are unclear and show distinct bias. Questions are missing from report and have never been submitted.	Poor Survey questions not pre-tested, but are somewhat clear and relatively unbaised. OR Question are not included in the report and had not been previously OKed.	Fair Survey questions have been pre-tested, but not completely refined or show some bias. OR Questions are not included in the report but have been previously submitted and OKed.	Good Survey questions have all been pre-tested and refined. They are unbiased, but somewhat unclear.	Excellent Survey questions have all been pre-tested and refined. They are clear and unbiased. Survey questions are included in the appredix of the report.
Data Recording and Summarization	Not Acceptable Original data is not available for review and the data is not tabulated appropriately.	Poor Original data are unavailable for review but the data is summarized partially correct in a table. OR Original data are available for review but the table is not accurate.	Fair Original data are unavailable for review but the data is summarized neatly, accurately and are clearly labeled. OR Original data are available for review, but there is a major flaw in the presentation of the data (but not in the accuracy of the tally).	Good Original data are availabe for review and summarized in appropriate table form. The tables however minor errors, sloppy, or not clearly labeled.	Excellent Original data are available for review and are summarized in an appropriate table form. Tables are neat, clearly labeled and accurate.
Graphical and Numberical Summaries	Not Acceptable Neither the graphical nor the numberical summaries are appropriate.	Poor Data has been correctly summarized graphically or numberically but not both. Or One of the data summaries is inappropriate.	Fair Data has been correctly summarized either graphically or numberically but there is a major error in one of the components.	Good Data has been correctly summarized using bar graphs/pie charts and counts/proportions/ percentages, but has made a minor error in either computation or graphing.	Excellent Data has been correctly summarized using bar graphs/pie charts and counts/proportions/ percentages. Graphs are accurate, labeled appropriately and neat
Interpretation of Data	Not Acceptable Interpretations and generalizations are missing.	Poor Interpretations are attempted but are inadequate. Generalizations concerning the population of interest are omitted.	Fair Interpretations of the graphical and numberical summaries have serious errors/omissions. In addition, an attempt is made at addressing generalization concerning the population of interest.	Good Interpretations of the graphical and numberical summaries have minor errors or omissions. In addition some generalizations concerning the population of interst are identify.	Excellent Interpretations of the graphical and numerical summaries are thorough and accurate. In addition, generalizations concerning the population of interest are identified.
Pitfalls and Extenstions	Not Acceptable Encountered pitfalls is not discusses nor are any plausible extensions given.	Poor Encountered pitfalls are articulated but no explanation concerning how these were dealt with is given AND No plausible extension of the project is given.	Fair Some encountered pitfallas are articulated with a brief explanation of how these were dealt with OR No plausible extension of the project is given.	Good Encountered pitfalls are clearly articulated, but explanations concerning how these were dealt with are unclear. AND One plausible extension of the project is given.	Excellent Encountered pitfalls are clearly articulated along with explanations of how these pitfalls where dealt with. AND One plausible extension of the project is given.
Confidence Statment	Not Acceptable The confidence statements fails in all of the following areas: applies to the population, correct confidence level, correct calculation of the margin of error, or understandability.	Poor The confidence statements fails in threee of the following areas: applies to the population, correct confidence level, correct calculation of the margin of error, or understandability.	Fair The confidence statements fails in two of the following areas: applies to the population, correct confidence level, correct calculation of the margin of error, or understandability.	Good The confidence statements fails in one of the following areas: applies to the population, correct confidence level, correct calculation of the margin of error, or understandability.	Excellent The confidence statement applies to the population, gives the correct confidence level, has a correctly calculated margin of error and is understandable.
English Mechanic	Not Acceptable Writing is deficient in all four areas: grammar, punctuation,spelling, flow.	Poor Writing is flawed in two or three areas: grammar, punctuation, spelling, flow.	Fair Significant errors in one of the areas: grammar, punctutation, spelling or flow. OR Minor erros in two areas.	Good Writing is grammatically correct, is punctuated properly, and flow locially from one point to the next, except for minor errors in one of these categories. No speling mistakes!!	Excellent Writing is grammatically correct, is punctuated propertly, and flow logically from one pont to the next. No spelling mistakes!!
Peer Evaluation	Not Acceptable Received an F average from group members.	Poor Received an D average from group members.	Fair Received an C average from group members.	Good Received an B average from group members.	Excellent Received an A average from group members.

Keywords:

Statistics

Subjects:

Math

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Math rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178