Skip to main content

iRubric: 6 Traits Scoring rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
6 Traits Scoring 
6 Traits Scoring
Rubric Code: M34WAA
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Excels Standard

6 pts

Mastered Standard

5 pts

Meets Standard

4 pts

Meets Standard

3 pts

Approaching Standard

2 pts

Falls Far Below Standard

1 pts

Ideas and Content

Excels Standard

The writing is exceptionally clear, focused and interesting.
It holds the reader’s attention throughout. Main ideas stand
out and are developed by strong support and rich details
suitable to audience and purpose.
Mastered Standard

The writing is clear, focused and interesting. It
holds the reader’s attention. Main ideas stand out
and are developed by supporting details suitable to
audience and purpose. The
Meets Standard

The writing is clear and focused. The reader can easily
understand the main ideas. Support is present, although it
may be limited or rather general.
Meets Standard

The reader can understand the main ideas, although they
may be overly broad or simplistic, and the results may not
be effective. Supporting detail is often limited,
insubstantial, overly general, or occasionally slightly offtopic.
Approaching Standard

Main ideas and purpose are somewhat unclear or
development is attempted but minimal. The
writing is characterized by
? a purpose and main idea(s) that may require
extensive inferences by the reader.
? minimal development; insufficient details.
? irrelevant details that clutter the text.
? extensive repetition of detail.
Falls Far Below Standard

The writing lacks a central idea or purpose. The writing is
characterized by
? ideas that are extremely limited or simply unclear.
? attempts at development that are minimal or nonexistent;
the paper is too short to demonstrate the
development of an idea.
Organization

Excels Standard

The organization enhances the central idea(s) and its
development. The order and structure are compelling and
move the reader through the text easily.
? effective, perhaps creative, sequencing; the organizational structure fits the topic, and the writing
is easy to follow.
? a strong, inviting beginning that draws the reader in
and a strong satisfying sense of resolution or closure.
? smooth, effective transitions among all elements
? details that fit where place
Mastered Standard

The organization enhances the central idea(s) and its
development. The order and structure are strong and
move the reader through the text.
? effective sequencing; the organizational structure
fits the topic, and the writing is easy to follow.
? an inviting beginning that draws the reader in and a
satisfying sense of resolution or closure.
? smooth, effective transitions among all elements
(sentences, paragraphs, and ideas).
? details that fit where placed.
Meets Standard

Organization is clear and coherent. Order and structure
are present, but may seem formulaic.
? clear sequencing.
? an organization that may be predictable.
? a recognizable, developed beginning that may not
be particularly inviting; a developed conclusion that
may lack subtlety.
? a body that is easy to follow with details that fit
where placed.
? transitions that may be stilted or formulaic.
? organization which helps the reader, despite some
weaknes
Meets Standard

An attempt has been made to organize the writing;
however, the overall structure is inconsistent or skeletal.
? attempts at sequencing
? a beginning and an ending which is undeveloped or too obvious (My topic)
? transitions that sometimes work or ioverused.
? a structure is skeletal
? placement of details not always effective.
? organization which lapses in some places
Approaching Standard

writing lacks a clear organizational structure. An
occasional organizational device is discernible;
however, the writing is either difficult to follow and the
reader has to reread substantial portions, or the piece is
simply too short to demonstrate organizational skills.
? some attempts at sequencing
? a missing or extremely undeveloped beginning,
body, ending.
? a lack of transitions? a lack of an effective organizational structure.
? details that seem to b
Falls Far Below Standard

The writing lacks coherence; organization seems
haphazard and disjointed. Even after rereading, the
reader remains confused. The writing is characterized
by
? a lack of effective sequencing.
? a failure to provide an identifiable beginning, body
and/or ending.
? a lack of transitions.
? pacing that is consistently awkward; the reader
feels either mired down in trivia or rushed along too
rapidly.
? a lack of organization which ultimately obscures or
Voice

Excels Standard

The writer has chosen a voice appropriate for the topic, purpose
and audience. The writer seems deeply committed to the topic,
and there is an exceptional sense of “writing to be read.” The
writing is expressive, engaging, or sincere.
Mastered Standard

The writer has chosen a voice appropriate for the topic,
purpose, and audience. The writer seems committed to the
topic, and there is a sense of “writing to be read.” The writing
is expressive, engaging or sincere.
Meets Standard

A voice is present. The writer demonstrates commitment to
the topic, and there may be a sense of “writing to be read.” In
places, the writing is expressive, engaging, or sincere.
Meets Standard

The writer’s commitment to the topic seems inconsistent. A
sense of the writer may emerge at times; however, the voice is
either inappropriately personal or inappropriately impersonal.
Approaching Standard

The writing provides little sense of involvement or
commitment. There is no evidence that the writer has chosen
a suitable voice.
Falls Far Below Standard

The writing seems to lack a sense of involvement or
commitment. The writing is characterized by
? no engagement of the writer; the writing is flat and
lifeless.
? a lack of audience awareness; there is no sense of
“writing to be read.”
? no hint of the writer behind the words. There is no sense
of interaction between writer and reader; the writing does
not involve or engage the reader.
Word Choice

Excels Standard
Mastered Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Approaching Standard
Falls Far Below Standard
Sentence Fluency

Excels Standard
Mastered Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Approaching Standard
Falls Far Below Standard
Conventions

Excels Standard
Mastered Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Approaching Standard
Falls Far Below Standard



Keywords:
  • 6 Traits Scoring

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202