Skip to main content
iRubric: Supreme Court Case-Presentation rubric

iRubric: Supreme Court Case-Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Supreme Court Case-Presentation 
Supreme Court Case with history and significance.
Rubric Code: M2W7C6C
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Law  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Case Study Presentation
  Poor - 1pt

0-1 points

0 pts

Fair - 2pts

2 points

0 pts

Average - 3pts

3 points

0 pts

Good - 4pts

4 points

0 pts

Exemplary - 5pts

5 points

0 pts

Met Assignment Crtieria
Overall Performance

Poor - 1pt

The student did not meet the expectations of this assignment.
Fair - 2pts

The student met few of the expectations of this assignment.
Average - 3pts

The student did not meet all expectations set in the assignment.
Good - 4pts

The student clearly understood the assignment and met the expectations.
Exemplary - 5pts

The student clearly understood the assignment and exceeded the expectations.
Case Information
Case Facts & Background

Poor - 1pt

Identifies & understands almost none of the basic information or lower court trials
Fair - 2pts

Identifies & understands few of the basic case facts and lower court trials
Average - 3pts

Identifies & understands some of the case facts and lower court trials
Good - 4pts

Identifies & understands most of the case facts and lower court trials
Exemplary - 5pts

Identifies & understands the case, the parties involved, the time frame, the lower court trials, and the reason it was heard at the Supreme Court.
Effects of Case

Poor - 1pt

Analysis was only provided of the effects of the case
Fair - 2pts

Marginal analysis of of the effects of the case
Average - 3pts

Somewhat thorough analysis of the effects of the case
Good - 4pts

Reasonably thorough analysis of each the effects of the case
Exemplary - 5pts

Very thorough and insightful analysis of each the effects of the case
Decision

Poor - 1pt

The final decision was not included.
Fair - 2pts

N/A
Average - 3pts

The final decision was included without any additional details.
Good - 4pts

The final recommendation was shared , including the tally of concurring and dissenting votes, but additional information was ommited.
Exemplary - 5pts

Explained the decision of the court, explaining the concurring and dissenting votes and the final recommendation.
Design & Presentation

Poor - 1pt

The slides are poorly designed, confusing to read, and don't complement what the speaker is saying.
Fair - 2pts

Some slides are clearly designed, but most are confusing or confusing to the view due to layout or text.
Average - 3pts

Slides are somewhate clearly designed, but some are confusing to read or don't make sense in the presentation.
Good - 4pts

Slides are designed clearly, but speakers put too much information directly onto slide rather than using slides to highlight.
Exemplary - 5pts

Slides are designed clearly.
Speakers supplement slides with information, rather than just reading to the audience from the screen.
Powerpoint Length

Poor - 1pt

The powerpoint presentation was between 1 and 1:59 minutes long.
Fair - 2pts

The powerpoint presentation was between 2 and 2:59 minutes long.
Average - 3pts

The powerpoint presentation was between 3 and 3:59 minutes long
Good - 4pts

The powerpoint presentation was between 4 and 4:59 minutes long
Exemplary - 5pts

The powerpoint presentation was at least 5 minutes long.
Oral Presentation Style

Poor - 1pt

The speaker didn't seem to know more than what was already typed on the slides.
Fair - 2pts

Speaker was confusing to the audience. They seemed to know about the case, but struggled to make the information clear to the audience.
Average - 3pts

Speaker was somewhat clear in their presention. Hesitation and/or volume control issues made some parts of the presentation difficult to understand.
Good - 4pts

Speaker was mostly clear and usually knew what they were saying. Some hesitation or volume control issues occured.
Exemplary - 5pts

Speaker was clear and well-informed. When the teacher or audience asked questions, the presenters were able to reply coherently.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232