Skip to main content
iRubric: Science Project Rubric

iRubric: Science Project Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Science Project Rubric 
Did the kids FOLLOW DIRECTIONS to create a project report?
Rubric Code: M22348
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Science Project
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Notebook

Poor

Has notebook but no evidence of work.
Fair

Has a notebook but does not HAVE the required three sections
Good

Has a notebook but does not MEET the required three sections
Excellent

Has notebook and the required three sections labeled and organized
Problem (Sect 1)

Poor

Does not state the problem. Questions not answered, problem has no direction, unclear thoughts.(jibberish nonsence)
Fair

Stating a problem but has no direction with problem. (Rambles on)
Good

Stating a problem, but variables are not clearly stated. (too many variables)
Excellent

Stating a problem. Follows correct format. Research is evident. Answers questions: Why are you performing the experiment? What are you trying to find out? Has clearly indentified independent and dependent variables.
Hypothesis (Sect 1)

Poor

Does not answer in a complete sentence. Not clear in thought and direction. No independent and dependent variable called out. Uses first person pronouns. (jibberish nonsense)
Fair

Does not use correct format. Is not an educated guess. Does not apply to the problem.
Good

Answers in a complete sentence. Applies directly to the problem. Uses correct format. Called out variables but not clear on direction.
Excellent

Answers in a complete sentence. It is an educated guess. Has clearly called out independent and dependent variables. Used correct format(If…then)
Background Research (Sect 1)

Poor

Has no written notes. Did not follow minimum requirements. No outside sources used. No support to experiment.
Fair

Has some written notes but does not have the minimum 10 pages of notes. Limited resources. Only one or two sources/types sited for credit.
Good

Does have the minimum 10 pages of notes but not the minimum resource requirement. Only one or two sources/types sited for credit.
Excellent

Fulfilled all minimum requirements.
Project Introduction (Sect 3)

Poor

Organization and structure has no flow, unclear, makes no sense, lack of thought transition. Paragraph is disjoined. Contains numerous grammatical and spelling errors. Inadequate/excessive in length.
Fair

Lacks clarity between purpose, problem, and hypothesis. Organization and structure is hard to follow. Inadequate/excessive in length.
Good

Includes purpose, problem, and hypothesis. What you hope to achieve. Explains why and what prompted your choice but not clearly. Has minimum of 150/200 words. Has few grammer, punctuation, and spelling errors. Structure of paragraph is not easy to follow.
Excellent

Includes purpose, problem, and hypothesis. Explain why and what prompted your choice. What you hope to achieve. Has minimum of 150/200 words. Structure of paragraph is clear and easy to follow. NO misspelled words. Grammatically correct.
Material (Sect 3)

Poor

Does not list the materials or all of the materials required for the experiment.
Fair

List of materials but NOT bulleted and to a page itself.
Good

List of bulleted materials but NOT to a page itself.
Excellent

List of materials is complete, bulleted, and is to a page itself.
Procedure/Method (Sect 3)

Poor

No procedure. Fragmented steps. No logical order.
Fair

Incomplete procedure. Incomplete sentences. Not to a page to itself. Fragmented steps. Not organized.
Good

Completed procedure and sentences. Page to itself. Logical and organized.
Excellent

Completed procedure. Completed sentences. Page to itself. Logical and organized. NO misspelled words. Grammatically correct.
Results (Sect 2)

Poor

No results. No documentation.
Fair

Documentation. No graphs and/or charts.
Good

Completed results with explanation.
Excellent

Completed results with COLORFUL graphs/charts. Organized and easy to read graphs/charts
Discussion/Analysis (Sect 3)

Poor

Organization and structure has no flow, unclear, makes no sense, lack of thought transition. Paragraphs are disjoined. No link between research, experiment, and results. Contains excessive grammatical and spelling errors. Inadequate in length. (jibberish nonsense)
Fair

Lacks clarity between research, experiment, and result. Vague and relevence unclear. Organization and structure is hard to follow. No direction. Inadequate in length. Has numerous spelling and grammer errors. (rambles on)
Good

Does not clearly link background research, experiment, and results. Not too clear in statements. Compares results with theoretical values and expected results. Shows implications and/or assumptions with results and resources used. Not detailed to getting end results. Has few grammer, punctuation, and spelling errors. Structure of paragraph is not easy to follow.
Excellent

Tells exactly what you did. Compares your results with the results of the resources used. Compares your values with theoretical values and expected results. What took place, in detail, to get the ending results. Thoroughly links background research, experiment, and results. Has minimum 750 words. NO misspelled words. Grammatically correct. Structure of paragraph is clear and easy to follow.
Conclusion (Sect 3)

Poor

Organization and structure has no flow, unclear, makes no sense, lack of thought transition. Paragraph is disjoined. Contains numerous grammatical and spelling errors. Inadequate/excessive in length.
Fair

Lacks clarity. Vague and unsupported. Has little relation to research. Organization and structure is hard to follow. Inadequate/excessive in length.
Good

Conclusion are inferred, assumed. It is summarized but no connection to hypothesis. Has minimum of 150/200 words. Has few grammer, punctuation, and spelling errors. Structure of paragraph is not easy to follow.
Excellent

Conclusion is related to the hypothesis. It is clearly supported by the data. It briefly summarizes and interprets the results. Has minimum of 150/200 words. Structure of paragraph is clear and easy to follow. NO misspelled words. Uses proper grammer and punctuations.



Keywords:
  • science project

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60