Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Science Project Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Science Project Rubric
Science Project Rubric
Did the kids FOLLOW DIRECTIONS to create a project report?
Rubric Code:
M22348
By
foster0828
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Science Project
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Notebook
Poor
Has notebook but no evidence of work.
Fair
Has a notebook but does not HAVE the required three sections
Good
Has a notebook but does not MEET the required three sections
Excellent
Has notebook and the required three sections labeled and organized
Problem (Sect 1)
Poor
Does not state the problem. Questions not answered, problem has no direction, unclear thoughts.(jibberish nonsence)
Fair
Stating a problem but has no direction with problem. (Rambles on)
Good
Stating a problem, but variables are not clearly stated. (too many variables)
Excellent
Stating a problem. Follows correct format. Research is evident. Answers questions: Why are you performing the experiment? What are you trying to find out? Has clearly indentified independent and dependent variables.
Hypothesis (Sect 1)
Poor
Does not answer in a complete sentence. Not clear in thought and direction. No independent and dependent variable called out. Uses first person pronouns. (jibberish nonsense)
Fair
Does not use correct format. Is not an educated guess. Does not apply to the problem.
Good
Answers in a complete sentence. Applies directly to the problem. Uses correct format. Called out variables but not clear on direction.
Excellent
Answers in a complete sentence. It is an educated guess. Has clearly called out independent and dependent variables. Used correct format(If…then)
Background Research (Sect 1)
Poor
Has no written notes. Did not follow minimum requirements. No outside sources used. No support to experiment.
Fair
Has some written notes but does not have the minimum 10 pages of notes. Limited resources. Only one or two sources/types sited for credit.
Good
Does have the minimum 10 pages of notes but not the minimum resource requirement. Only one or two sources/types sited for credit.
Excellent
Fulfilled all minimum requirements.
Project Introduction (Sect 3)
Poor
Organization and structure has no flow, unclear, makes no sense, lack of thought transition. Paragraph is disjoined. Contains numerous grammatical and spelling errors. Inadequate/excessive in length.
Fair
Lacks clarity between purpose, problem, and hypothesis. Organization and structure is hard to follow. Inadequate/excessive in length.
Good
Includes purpose, problem, and hypothesis. What you hope to achieve. Explains why and what prompted your choice but not clearly. Has minimum of 150/200 words. Has few grammer, punctuation, and spelling errors. Structure of paragraph is not easy to follow.
Excellent
Includes purpose, problem, and hypothesis. Explain why and what prompted your choice. What you hope to achieve. Has minimum of 150/200 words. Structure of paragraph is clear and easy to follow. NO misspelled words. Grammatically correct.
Material (Sect 3)
Poor
Does not list the materials or all of the materials required for the experiment.
Fair
List of materials but NOT bulleted and to a page itself.
Good
List of bulleted materials but NOT to a page itself.
Excellent
List of materials is complete, bulleted, and is to a page itself.
Procedure/Method (Sect 3)
Poor
No procedure. Fragmented steps. No logical order.
Fair
Incomplete procedure. Incomplete sentences. Not to a page to itself. Fragmented steps. Not organized.
Good
Completed procedure and sentences. Page to itself. Logical and organized.
Excellent
Completed procedure. Completed sentences. Page to itself. Logical and organized. NO misspelled words. Grammatically correct.
Results (Sect 2)
Poor
No results. No documentation.
Fair
Documentation. No graphs and/or charts.
Good
Completed results with explanation.
Excellent
Completed results with COLORFUL graphs/charts. Organized and easy to read graphs/charts
Discussion/Analysis (Sect 3)
Poor
Organization and structure has no flow, unclear, makes no sense, lack of thought transition. Paragraphs are disjoined. No link between research, experiment, and results. Contains excessive grammatical and spelling errors. Inadequate in length. (jibberish nonsense)
Fair
Lacks clarity between research, experiment, and result. Vague and relevence unclear. Organization and structure is hard to follow. No direction. Inadequate in length. Has numerous spelling and grammer errors. (rambles on)
Good
Does not clearly link background research, experiment, and results. Not too clear in statements. Compares results with theoretical values and expected results. Shows implications and/or assumptions with results and resources used. Not detailed to getting end results. Has few grammer, punctuation, and spelling errors. Structure of paragraph is not easy to follow.
Excellent
Tells exactly what you did. Compares your results with the results of the resources used. Compares your values with theoretical values and expected results. What took place, in detail, to get the ending results. Thoroughly links background research, experiment, and results. Has minimum 750 words. NO misspelled words. Grammatically correct. Structure of paragraph is clear and easy to follow.
Conclusion (Sect 3)
Poor
Organization and structure has no flow, unclear, makes no sense, lack of thought transition. Paragraph is disjoined. Contains numerous grammatical and spelling errors. Inadequate/excessive in length.
Fair
Lacks clarity. Vague and unsupported. Has little relation to research. Organization and structure is hard to follow. Inadequate/excessive in length.
Good
Conclusion are inferred, assumed. It is summarized but no connection to hypothesis. Has minimum of 150/200 words. Has few grammer, punctuation, and spelling errors. Structure of paragraph is not easy to follow.
Excellent
Conclusion is related to the hypothesis. It is clearly supported by the data. It briefly summarizes and interprets the results. Has minimum of 150/200 words. Structure of paragraph is clear and easy to follow. NO misspelled words. Uses proper grammer and punctuations.
Keywords:
science project
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.