Skip to main content
iRubric: English III Major Research Paper (Content) rubric

iRubric: English III Major Research Paper (Content) rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
English III Major Research Paper (Content) 
Rubric Code: LXA2CB
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Research Paper
  What Were You Thinking?

(N/A)

Push A Bit More...

(N/A)

Almost There...

(N/A)

Woo Hoo!

(N/A)

Title Page
20 pts

What Were You Thinking?

Format does not meet the criteria---No title page

(5)
Push A Bit More...

Format does not meet the criteria completely

(10)
Almost There...

Format is incorrect by one item (name, date, title, or class period)

(15)
Woo Hoo!

Format is appropriate---No errors

(20)
Length
80 pts

What Were You Thinking?

1 page or less




(20)
Push A Bit More...

2 pages




(40)
Almost There...

3 pages




(60)
Woo Hoo!

4 pages or more




(80)
Format
20 pts

What Were You Thinking?

Format does not meet criteria---no format



(5)
Push A Bit More...

MLA format is not used within the paper---Or two or more of the following is incorrect
-12 point font not used
-One inch margins not used
-Times New Roman/Arial font not used
-Double space not used

(10)
Almost There...

One of the following is incorrect---
-12 point font not used
-One inch margins not used
-Times New Roman/Arial font not used
-Double space not used

(15)
Woo Hoo!

Format is appropriate
-12 point font
-One inch margins
-Times New Roman/Arial font
-MLA citations in the paper done correctly
-Double spaced

(20)
Content
20 pts

What Were You Thinking?

Thesis unclear or nonexistent---Or support for thesis is insufficient---Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion are nonexistent

(5)
Push A Bit More...

Theseis is too broad or narrow for the length of the paper and/or poor topic for research---Support for tehseis is barely sufficient and/or---Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion are lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.

(10)
Almost There...

Thesis is somewhat broad or narrow for the length of the paper and/or a questionable topic for research---Support for thesis is sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.---Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion are slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness

(15)
Woo Hoo!

Thesis is interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of the paper and an appropriate topic for research---Support for thesis is complex, complete, and in-depth, ---Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment---Clear and appropriate organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion

(20)
Quality
20 pts

What Were You Thinking?

The paper is not objective and poorly addresses the topic of research---The information provided is not necessary or sufficient to discuss the topic

(5)
Push A Bit More...

The paper is somewhat objective---The information provided may not ALL be necessary or sufficient to discuss the topic

(10)
Almost There...

The paper is objective and for the most part addresses the issues of the proposed topic---The information provided is necessary and sufficient for the topic

(15)
Woo Hoo!

The paper is objective adn addresses the issues of the proposed topic. The information provided is necessary and sufficient to discuss the topic

(20)
Organization
20 pts

What Were You Thinking?

Not organized at all

(5)
Push A Bit More...

Some parts may flow, but for the most part there is no organization

(10)
Almost There...

Somewhat organized with a few errors

(15)
Woo Hoo!

Clear with an introduction, body, and conclusion. Paper flows with transitions into each paragraph

(20)
Word Choice/Voice
20 pts

What Were You Thinking?

Sentences do not make sense, ramble, begin the same way and endlessly connect to others---Little to no voice

(5)
Push A Bit More...

Sentence structures are simplistic and monotonous---Need complexity, but they do make sense

(10)
Almost There...

Sentences get the job done, constructed correctly, and sound good---Sentence structures attempt to vary, as do sentence beginnings---Good voice

(15)
Woo Hoo!

Writing has an easy flow, with strong varied sentence structures---There are varied and purposeful sentence beginnings---Filled with voice and individuality

(20)
Bibliography
100 pts

What Were You Thinking?

Incorrect format/or no sources (no sources = an automatic 50 on entire paper)

(50)
Push A Bit More...

Not all sources are properly cited on the bibliography---fewer than 3 sources

(65)
Almost There...

All sources are cited properly in the bibliography---fewer than 8 sources

(75)
Woo Hoo!

All Sources are cited properly in the bibliography---All sources are there

(100)




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232