Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: English III Major Research Paper (Content) rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
English III Major Research Paper (Content)
Rubric Code:
LXA2CB
By
hmrthree
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Research Paper
What Were You Thinking?
(N/A)
Push A Bit More...
(N/A)
Almost There...
(N/A)
Woo Hoo!
(N/A)
Title Page
20 pts
What Were You Thinking?
Format does not meet the criteria---No title page
(5)
Push A Bit More...
Format does not meet the criteria completely
(10)
Almost There...
Format is incorrect by one item (name, date, title, or class period)
(15)
Woo Hoo!
Format is appropriate---No errors
(20)
Length
80 pts
What Were You Thinking?
1 page or less
(20)
Push A Bit More...
2 pages
(40)
Almost There...
3 pages
(60)
Woo Hoo!
4 pages or more
(80)
Format
20 pts
What Were You Thinking?
Format does not meet criteria---no format
(5)
Push A Bit More...
MLA format is not used within the paper---Or two or more of the following is incorrect
-12 point font not used
-One inch margins not used
-Times New Roman/Arial font not used
-Double space not used
(10)
Almost There...
One of the following is incorrect---
-12 point font not used
-One inch margins not used
-Times New Roman/Arial font not used
-Double space not used
(15)
Woo Hoo!
Format is appropriate
-12 point font
-One inch margins
-Times New Roman/Arial font
-MLA citations in the paper done correctly
-Double spaced
(20)
Content
20 pts
What Were You Thinking?
Thesis unclear or nonexistent---Or support for thesis is insufficient---Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion are nonexistent
(5)
Push A Bit More...
Theseis is too broad or narrow for the length of the paper and/or poor topic for research---Support for tehseis is barely sufficient and/or---Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion are lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
(10)
Almost There...
Thesis is somewhat broad or narrow for the length of the paper and/or a questionable topic for research---Support for thesis is sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.---Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion are slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness
(15)
Woo Hoo!
Thesis is interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of the paper and an appropriate topic for research---Support for thesis is complex, complete, and in-depth, ---Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment---Clear and appropriate organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion
(20)
Quality
20 pts
What Were You Thinking?
The paper is not objective and poorly addresses the topic of research---The information provided is not necessary or sufficient to discuss the topic
(5)
Push A Bit More...
The paper is somewhat objective---The information provided may not ALL be necessary or sufficient to discuss the topic
(10)
Almost There...
The paper is objective and for the most part addresses the issues of the proposed topic---The information provided is necessary and sufficient for the topic
(15)
Woo Hoo!
The paper is objective adn addresses the issues of the proposed topic. The information provided is necessary and sufficient to discuss the topic
(20)
Organization
20 pts
What Were You Thinking?
Not organized at all
(5)
Push A Bit More...
Some parts may flow, but for the most part there is no organization
(10)
Almost There...
Somewhat organized with a few errors
(15)
Woo Hoo!
Clear with an introduction, body, and conclusion. Paper flows with transitions into each paragraph
(20)
Word Choice/Voice
20 pts
What Were You Thinking?
Sentences do not make sense, ramble, begin the same way and endlessly connect to others---Little to no voice
(5)
Push A Bit More...
Sentence structures are simplistic and monotonous---Need complexity, but they do make sense
(10)
Almost There...
Sentences get the job done, constructed correctly, and sound good---Sentence structures attempt to vary, as do sentence beginnings---Good voice
(15)
Woo Hoo!
Writing has an easy flow, with strong varied sentence structures---There are varied and purposeful sentence beginnings---Filled with voice and individuality
(20)
Bibliography
100 pts
What Were You Thinking?
Incorrect format/or no sources (no sources = an automatic 50 on entire paper)
(50)
Push A Bit More...
Not all sources are properly cited on the bibliography---fewer than 3 sources
(65)
Almost There...
All sources are cited properly in the bibliography---fewer than 8 sources
(75)
Woo Hoo!
All Sources are cited properly in the bibliography---All sources are there
(100)
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.