iRubric: Glogster Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Glogster Rubric Glogster Rubric This is a rubric used to assess the Glogster for the Biography project. Essential ideas and for the students to use as a guide when completing their Glogster assignments. From EDU GLOGSTER educator resource guide Rubric Code: LX56BA7 By marlabrown6 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5, 9-12

Glogster
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Needs Improvement 1 pts
Glog artifact	Excellent The Glog has a well-stated clear purpose and factual information is clearly presented in the glog. Facts are related and correctly stated to historical figure with clear writing expectations.	Good The Glog has a stated purpose and theme, but may have one or two elements that do not seem to be related to it. Written facts may have one or two errors in mechanics, but all information given is correct.	Fair The purpose and theme of the Glog is some- what muddy or vague. There are several elements that do no seem to be related to topic. Mechanics of writing consists of multiple errors, some information is incorrect about historical figure.	Needs Improvement The Glog lacks a purpose and theme. Very few facts given, many errors in mechanics of writing, focus is not to present information rather create a picture.
Idea development/support	Excellent The student has an exceptional understanding of the topic. Research is clearly represented in the amount of supporting details in essay. Student addresses all components and guidelines for information subtopics.	Good The student has a strong general understanding of the topic. Research is evident with supporting details present in subtopic paragraphs. Student addresses most components and guidelines for information subtopics	Fair The student has a some general understanding of the topic. Research is somewhat evident with supporting details present in subtopic paragraphs. Student addresses some components and guidelines for information subtopi	Needs Improvement Student did not appear to learn much from this project. Little research evidence is present in essay and lacks supporting details. Few of the components and guidelines were included in the information sub topics