Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Literary Critical Analysis rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Literary Critical Analysis
Literary Critical Analysis
Students will show their ability to read "Lord of the Flies" critically by writing an analytical response in the form of an essay.
Rubric Code:
LX34C84
By
nachevstanislav
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
CRITERIA
Unsatisfactory
Level 1
(50 - 59%)
(N/A)
Needs Improvement
Level 2
(60 - 69%)
(N/A)
Proficient
Level 3
(70 - 79%)
(N/A)
Exemplary
Level 4
(80 - 100%)
(N/A)
(N/A)
KNOWLEDGE/UNDERSTANDING
Unsatisfactory
No thesis, or thesis is lacking claim and/or reasons. Does not develop interpretations that are relevant and/or accurate. Demonstrates a limited grasp of the text.
Needs Improvement
Thesis statement presents claim and/or reasons, but ideas are muddy. Develops interpretations that may not be relevant or accurate. Demonstrates a limited grasp of the text. Includes interpretations that lack accuracy or coherence as related to ideas, premises or images from the literary work.
Proficient
Thesis statement clearly presents the claim and reasons. Develops interpretations that are relevant and demonstrates an adequate grasp of the text. Accurate and reasonably coherent interpretations around clear ideas, premises, or images from a literary work.
Exemplary
Thesis statement clearly presents the claim and reasons. A counterclaim is also presented. Develops interpretations that are relevant and meaningful. Demonstrates a comprehensive grasp of the text.
N/A
__/10
APPLICATION
Unsatisfactory
Provides few, if any, textual examples and details. The examples and details provided do not clearly support the interpretations.
Needs Improvement
Provides few textual examples and details to support the interpretations. May be lacking explanation of textual examples.
Proficient
Provides textual examples and details to support interpretations. Textual examples are explained.
Exemplary
Provides abundant, relevant, and thorough textual examples and details to support interpretations. Textual examples are explained fully and thoroughly prove the thesis.
N/A
__/10
THINKING/INQUIRY
Unsatisfactory
Minimal ability to respond to and/or question the author's purpose and use of evidence. Does not point out effective and ineffective methods and techniques employed by the author.
Needs Improvement
Limited ability to respond to and/or question the author's purpose and use of evidence. Ability to point out effective and ineffective methods and techniques employed by the author is limited.
Proficient
Ability to respond to and/or question the author's purpose and use of evidence. Adequately points out effective and ineffective techniques and methods employed by the author.
Exemplary
Superior ability to respond to and/or question the author's purpose and use of evidence. Accurately points out effective and/or ineffective techniques and methods employed by the author.
N/A
__/10
COMMUNICATION
Unsatisfactory
Organization is lacking. Title(s) and author(s) may be missing. Frequent grammatical and/or spelling errors that interfere with understanding. There may be run-ons and/or fragments.
Needs Improvement
The essay shows some organization. Title(s) and author(s) may be included. Grammatical and/or spelling errors begin to interfere with understanding. There may be run-ons and/or fragments.
Proficient
The essay is organized into introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Title(s) and author(s) are included in the introduction. Few grammatical or spelling errors.
Exemplary
Sophisticated organization. Introduction includes title(s) and author(s). No grammatical or spelling errors. No fragments or run-ons.
N/A
__/10
-------
Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement
Proficient
Exemplary
TOTAL
N/A
__/40
Keywords:
Literature, analysis, critical reading
Subjects:
English
Foreign Languages
Geology
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Presentation
Reading
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.