iRubric: HAP Case Study Rubric

Signs, symptoms, lab tests and other relevant medical information may be explained, but may be lacking detail or case-relevance. There may be a lack of an obvious inductive logic process leading to the diagnosis. Diagnosis, treatments and other information may lack detail and/or case relevance. No additional data, tables or images are added when appropriate or, if present, are inappropriately placed or without explanation

Signs, symptoms, lab tests and other relevant medical information is explained but may be lacking in some detail or case relevance in some instances. There is a clear inductive logic to formulate a reasonable diagnosis, but it may need some more detail to bolster the argument. Diagnosis, treatments and other information is researched and case-relevant but may miss one or two points. Additional tables, images and other data may or may not be included when appropriate.

Signs, symptoms, lab tests and other relevant medical information is defined and explained as it relates to the specific case study. There is a logical use of data to formulate a reasonable medical diagnosis and this process of inductive reasoning is clear throughout. Diagnosis, treatments and other information is thorough, well-researched and case relevant. Additional tables, images and data are included when appropriate

Writing may be unclear or difficult to read due to poor grammar and/or vocabulary usage, syntax, etc. Narrative paragraphs, when used, may be unclear, too long or short or lack focus. Writing may or may not stay on topic

Writing is clear for the most part and grammatical rules are generally followed with a few exceptions. When appropriate, narrative paragraphs are used but may need some work regarding clarity, brevity or focus. All writing is on topic.

Writing is clear and all grammatical rules are followed. When appropriate, narrative paragraphs are used and are written for clarity, brevity and focus.