Skip to main content

iRubric: Original Sonnet Writing & Presentation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Original Sonnet Writing & Presentation Rubric 
Original Sonnet Writing & Recital Rubric
Students have selected one of the sonnet types below and have written an original sonnet based on that structure (Spencerain, Petrachan, or Shakespearean). They are expected to employ, manipulate, and recite various poetic devices with mastery during the rectial of this original sonnet. Please use the rubric below and grade them accordingly. Place this rubric in my box after it is completed. Thank you for taking the time to listen to and grade these sonnets.
Rubric Code: L9WCW7
By ir407teach
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Speak--Sonnet
  Does Not Meet Standards

1 pts

Below Standards

2 pts

Meeting Standards

3 pts

Exceeding Standards

4 pts

Literary Elements (Imagery, Tone)

Does Not Meet Standards

Usage of imagery, diction, inflection, and tone is slim to non-existent. Instances of such are derivative and not well thought out. Few, if any, senses are used to create concrete images. Tone is either off-mark or not apparent. No thoughtfulness perceived.
Below Standards

Imagery, diction, inflection, and tone are somewhat interesting. Few senses are realized in the language of the poem. The poem is somewhat thought out. Tone is somewhat developed, yet not strong enough to be truly memorable.
Meeting Standards

Some concrete images arise in the reader's mind. The poem is good, but not memorable. A cursory usage of descriptive language with more than two appeals to the senses.
Exceeding Standards

Imagery, diction, inflection, and tone are concrete and appeal to multiple senses. The poem personifies thoughtful descriptive language, interesting imagery, and an appropriate tone according to the poet's intent. Memorable and thought-provoking.
Understanding of Form

Does Not Meet Standards

Poem strays significantly from the proper form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen). There are fewer than 10 lines of poetry, does not follow iambic pentametre (less than 9 syllables) and has not followed any ryhme scheme.
Below Standards

Poem strays somewhat from the proper form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen). There are at least 10 lines of poetry, generally follows iambic pentametre (9-11 syllables) and has generally followed a ryhme scheme.
Meeting Standards

Poem is mostly written in the proper form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen). There are at least 12 lines of poetry, generally follows iambic pentameter (9-11 syllables) and has generally followed a ryhme scheme.
Exceeding Standards

Poem is complete and follows its intended form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen), i.e. has 14 lines of poetry, three quatrains, uses iambic pentameter, has a couplet and rhyme scheme.
Sound Devices (Rhyme, Alliteration)

Does Not Meet Standards

Little to no usage of sound devices. Musicality of poem is nonexistent. The poem trudges along and is truly unvaried.
Below Standards

Cursory usage of sound devices, with some nice usage of alliteration, assonance, etc. While decent, the poem still lacks a certain musicality that would make it flow better.
Meeting Standards

Good usage of sound devices. Some devices give the poem a nice flow, yet they are too far apart to make the poem cohesive as a whole.
Exceeding Standards

Rhyme, alliteration, consonance, and assonance create a flowing, organic musical quality to the poem. Multiple thoughtful, well placed, and easy to hear examples in oral reading.
Originality and Revision

Does Not Meet Standards

Poem shows virtually no originality or voice. Little to no revision was made between the drafts. Poem has little imagery and sound quality. No title. The poem is not creative and appears to be rushed. This is evident in too obvious meaning and a lack of originality.
Below Standards

Poem shows a fair amount of originality and thoughtfulness, yet it is sprinkled with cliche ideas/idioms. Some revision between drafts has cursory language, imagery, and sound quality. Title is uninteresting.
The poem is creative, but appears to be rushed.
Meeting Standards

Poem is thoughtful and creative. A couple of phrases or ideas may be revisited, but the overall product is carefully written. Good, thoughtful revision between drafts. Title is good.
Exceeding Standards

Poem has an engaging title. It is faithful to the overall theme of a sonnet. It is evident that the poet put thought into the diction and was innovative in conveying the ideas and emotions of the sonnet. Revision is thoughtful and apparent.
Formal Usage of Language

Does Not Meet Standards

Punctuation and spelling is poor and not reflective of student's true capabilities. Poor mechanics interferes with the poem's readability. No apparent revision done in mechanics.
Below Standards

Errors are noticeable. Spelling and punctuation are fair yet not reflective of student's skills. Poem is readable, yet mistakes distract the reader. Punctuation usage is acceptable for tone of poem.
Meeting Standards

Few grammatical errors that do not distract the reader. Punctuation is congruent with the tone of the poem.
Exceeding Standards

No punctuation or spelling errors. Shows a strong grasp of poetic language through creative use of punctuation.
Presentation Voice

Does Not Meet Standards

Usage of voice, diction, inflection, and tone is slim to non-existent. Few, if any, parts are recited. Tone is either off-mark or monotonous.
Below Standards

Voice, diction, inflection, and tone are somewhat heard. Few moments are in clear spoken language. Tone is somewhat developed, yet not strong enough to be truly memorable.
Meeting Standards

Some voice is heard clearly. The clarity of voice is good, but not memorable. Tone is developed yet has few vocal errors.
Exceeding Standards

Voice, diction, inflection, and tone are concrete and appeal to multiple senses. Memorable and thought-provoking. Confident voice.
Presentation Images

Does Not Meet Standards

Does not meet the minimum of 8 pictures. Photo are not personal to the author and do not support the images in the poetry.
Below Standards

Few pictures (2-4) are custom, personal and self-created photos that work with the poetry and helps reader understand images.
Meeting Standards

Most pictures (5-7)are custom, personal and self-created photos that work with the poetry and helps reader understand images.
Exceeding Standards

8 or more custom, personal and self-created photos that enhance the poetry and helps visualize the words and images.
Presentation Creativity

Does Not Meet Standards

Overall Impresion is Below average. there is room to improve in every category.
Below Standards

Overall Impresion is Average. There is room to improve in some categories.
Meeting Standards

Overall Impresion is Above Average. There is room to improve in few categories.
Exceeding Standards

Overall Impresion is Excellent. There is little to no room to improve in any category.



Keywords:
  • Poetry - Sonnet Writing

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202