Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Original Sonnet Writing & Presentation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Original Sonnet Writing & Presentation Rubric
Original Sonnet Writing & Recital Rubric
Students have selected one of the sonnet types below and have written an original sonnet based on that structure (Spencerain, Petrachan, or Shakespearean). They are expected to employ, manipulate, and recite various poetic devices with mastery during the rectial of this original sonnet. Please use the rubric below and grade them accordingly. Place this rubric in my box after it is completed. Thank you for taking the time to listen to and grade these sonnets.
Rubric Code:
L9WCW7
By
ir407teach
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Speak--Sonnet
Does Not Meet Standards
1 pts
Below Standards
2 pts
Meeting Standards
3 pts
Exceeding Standards
4 pts
Literary Elements (Imagery, Tone)
Does Not Meet Standards
Usage of imagery, diction, inflection, and tone is slim to non-existent. Instances of such are derivative and not well thought out. Few, if any, senses are used to create concrete images. Tone is either off-mark or not apparent. No thoughtfulness perceived.
Below Standards
Imagery, diction, inflection, and tone are somewhat interesting. Few senses are realized in the language of the poem. The poem is somewhat thought out. Tone is somewhat developed, yet not strong enough to be truly memorable.
Meeting Standards
Some concrete images arise in the reader's mind. The poem is good, but not memorable. A cursory usage of descriptive language with more than two appeals to the senses.
Exceeding Standards
Imagery, diction, inflection, and tone are concrete and appeal to multiple senses. The poem personifies thoughtful descriptive language, interesting imagery, and an appropriate tone according to the poet's intent. Memorable and thought-provoking.
Understanding of Form
Does Not Meet Standards
Poem strays significantly from the proper form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen). There are fewer than 10 lines of poetry, does not follow iambic pentametre (less than 9 syllables) and has not followed any ryhme scheme.
Below Standards
Poem strays somewhat from the proper form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen). There are at least 10 lines of poetry, generally follows iambic pentametre (9-11 syllables) and has generally followed a ryhme scheme.
Meeting Standards
Poem is mostly written in the proper form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen). There are at least 12 lines of poetry, generally follows iambic pentameter (9-11 syllables) and has generally followed a ryhme scheme.
Exceeding Standards
Poem is complete and follows its intended form of a sonnet (pending which form is chosen), i.e. has 14 lines of poetry, three quatrains, uses iambic pentameter, has a couplet and rhyme scheme.
Sound Devices (Rhyme, Alliteration)
Does Not Meet Standards
Little to no usage of sound devices. Musicality of poem is nonexistent. The poem trudges along and is truly unvaried.
Below Standards
Cursory usage of sound devices, with some nice usage of alliteration, assonance, etc. While decent, the poem still lacks a certain musicality that would make it flow better.
Meeting Standards
Good usage of sound devices. Some devices give the poem a nice flow, yet they are too far apart to make the poem cohesive as a whole.
Exceeding Standards
Rhyme, alliteration, consonance, and assonance create a flowing, organic musical quality to the poem. Multiple thoughtful, well placed, and easy to hear examples in oral reading.
Originality and Revision
Does Not Meet Standards
Poem shows virtually no originality or voice. Little to no revision was made between the drafts. Poem has little imagery and sound quality. No title. The poem is not creative and appears to be rushed. This is evident in too obvious meaning and a lack of originality.
Below Standards
Poem shows a fair amount of originality and thoughtfulness, yet it is sprinkled with cliche ideas/idioms. Some revision between drafts has cursory language, imagery, and sound quality. Title is uninteresting.
The poem is creative, but appears to be rushed.
Meeting Standards
Poem is thoughtful and creative. A couple of phrases or ideas may be revisited, but the overall product is carefully written. Good, thoughtful revision between drafts. Title is good.
Exceeding Standards
Poem has an engaging title. It is faithful to the overall theme of a sonnet. It is evident that the poet put thought into the diction and was innovative in conveying the ideas and emotions of the sonnet. Revision is thoughtful and apparent.
Formal Usage of Language
Does Not Meet Standards
Punctuation and spelling is poor and not reflective of student's true capabilities. Poor mechanics interferes with the poem's readability. No apparent revision done in mechanics.
Below Standards
Errors are noticeable. Spelling and punctuation are fair yet not reflective of student's skills. Poem is readable, yet mistakes distract the reader. Punctuation usage is acceptable for tone of poem.
Meeting Standards
Few grammatical errors that do not distract the reader. Punctuation is congruent with the tone of the poem.
Exceeding Standards
No punctuation or spelling errors. Shows a strong grasp of poetic language through creative use of punctuation.
Presentation Voice
Does Not Meet Standards
Usage of voice, diction, inflection, and tone is slim to non-existent. Few, if any, parts are recited. Tone is either off-mark or monotonous.
Below Standards
Voice, diction, inflection, and tone are somewhat heard. Few moments are in clear spoken language. Tone is somewhat developed, yet not strong enough to be truly memorable.
Meeting Standards
Some voice is heard clearly. The clarity of voice is good, but not memorable. Tone is developed yet has few vocal errors.
Exceeding Standards
Voice, diction, inflection, and tone are concrete and appeal to multiple senses. Memorable and thought-provoking. Confident voice.
Presentation Images
Does Not Meet Standards
Does not meet the minimum of 8 pictures. Photo are not personal to the author and do not support the images in the poetry.
Below Standards
Few pictures (2-4) are custom, personal and self-created photos that work with the poetry and helps reader understand images.
Meeting Standards
Most pictures (5-7)are custom, personal and self-created photos that work with the poetry and helps reader understand images.
Exceeding Standards
8 or more custom, personal and self-created photos that enhance the poetry and helps visualize the words and images.
Presentation Creativity
Does Not Meet Standards
Overall Impresion is Below average. there is room to improve in every category.
Below Standards
Overall Impresion is Average. There is room to improve in some categories.
Meeting Standards
Overall Impresion is Above Average. There is room to improve in few categories.
Exceeding Standards
Overall Impresion is Excellent. There is little to no room to improve in any category.
Keywords:
Poetry - Sonnet Writing
Subjects:
English
Types:
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.