Skip to main content
iRubric: Rubric for Mesoamerican Digital Research Project

iRubric: Rubric for Mesoamerican Digital Research Project

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rubric for Mesoamerican Digital Research Project 
5 Paragraph Essay and Works Cited page, Video, CDP,and E-Portfolio Site
Rubric Code: L7XAC2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Essay
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Introduction

Poor

Introduction does not introduce topic. Essential question is not supported by the these statement.
Fair

Introduction attempts to introduce topic. Points are not obvious. Essential question is vaguely supported by the thesis statement.
Good

Introduction introduces topic but is wordy or too specific. Essential question is supported but not clearly answered by the thesis statement.
Excellent

Introduction is concise and introduces topic in a general but interesting way. Essential questions is clearly answered by the thesis statement.
Organization

Poor

Fails to organize ideas.
Fair

Shows some evidence of an organizational plan.
Good

Uses an identifiable
organizational plan.
Excellent

Establishes a clear and logical organization.
Supporting Details and Explanations

Poor

No supporting details or explanations are provided.
Fair

Some supporting details and explanations are present but inadequate or not connected to your EQ.
Good

There are supporting details and explanations, though some may be missing. Details are included, but may not fully support the EQ.
Excellent

Student details and explains the EQ thoroughly throughout the body paragraphs.
Conclusion

Poor

No conclusion is apparent in the essay.
Fair

Conclusion may be attempted, but does not summarize or restate thesis.
Good

Conclusion provides a summary of supporting points: it is wordy or does not restate the thesis.
Excellent

Conclusion is concise and summarizes supporting points: restates the thesis in a new way.
Research

Poor

Shows little or no research and shows a lack of understanding of the topic.
Fair

Did some research and attempted to create use it in the writing.
Good

Did good research and uses some of the research to explain the topic.
Excellent

Presents thorough research and combines the research with own ideas to explain topic well.
Works Cited Page

Poor

Works Cited Page is not present. (0 pts)
Fair
Good

Works Cited page is present but not formatted properly.
Excellent

Works Cited page is present and formatted properly.
Mechanics of Essay
Mechanics

Poor

Errors are glaring and the essay is difficult to read.
Fair

There are several errors which detract from the overall meaning and flow of the essay.
Good

Some errors are found. They do not detract from the general flow of the essay.
Excellent

Few or no errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization are found.
Flow/Transitions

Poor

No flow to writing. Argument is difficult to follow.

No transitions used.
Fair

Sentences are short or run-ons. Flow of essay is hard to follow.

Little to no transitions used.
Good

Vocabulary or writing style needs further development.

Some basic transitions used.
Excellent

Writing has voice and flows easily.

Appropriate transitions used.
Clarity

Poor

The writing is jumbled and the meaning is not clear to the reader.
Fair

The overall idea is clear, but some points are impossible to understand.
Good

The writing is generally clear, but some sentence structure or vocabulary usage needs improvement.
Excellent

The writing is clear and easy to understand.
Video
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Quality of Content

Poor

The topic of the video is not connected to the EQ or repeats a topic already covered in the essay. The video does not show that the student has engaged the chosen topic critically or personally.
Fair

The topic of the video is connected to the EQ but the video may not show that the student has learned about or engaged the chosen topic critically or uniquely from the written essay.
Good

The topic of the video is clearly connected to the EQ and the video shows that the student has learned about and engaged the chosen topic.
Excellent

The topic of the video is clearly connected to the EQ and the video clearly showcases the extensive student learning and engagement of the chosen topic. The student has designed a unique video presentation.
Creativity

Poor

The student has designed a video presentation that lacks information and creative touches.
Fair

The student has designed an informative video presentation but may not have made it unique or personal.
Good

The student has designed an informative video presentation in a unique and personal way.
Excellent

The student has designed an engaging and informative video presentation in a unique, special, and personal way.
Research

Poor

Shows little or no research and shows a lack of understanding of the topic.
Fair

Did some research and attempted to create use it in the writing.
Good

Did good research and uses some of the research to explain the topic.
Excellent

Presents thorough research and combines the research with own ideas to explain topic well.
Creative Digital Presentation
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Quality of Content

Poor

The topic of the CDP is not connected to the EQ or repeats a topic already covered in the essay. The CDP does not show that the student has engaged the chosen topic critically or personally.
Fair

The topic of the CDP is connected to the EQ but the CDP may not show that the student has learned about or engaged the chosen topic critically or uniquely from the written essay.
Good

The topic of the CDP is clearly connected to the EQ and the CDP shows that the student has learned about and engaged the chosen topic.
Excellent

The topic of the CDP is clearly connected to the EQ and the CDP clearly showcases the extensive student learning and engagement of the chosen topic. The student has designed a unique CDP.
Creativity

Poor

The student has designed a CDP that lacks information and creative touches.
Fair

The student has designed an informative CDP but may not have made it unique or personal.
Good

The student has designed an informative CDP in a unique and personal way.
Excellent

The student has designed an engaging and informative CDP in a unique, special, and personal way.
Research

Poor

Shows little or no research and shows a lack of understanding of the topic.
Fair

Did some research and attempted to create use it in the writing.
Good

Did good research and uses some of the research to explain the topic.
Excellent

Presents thorough research and combines the research with own ideas to explain topic well.
E-Portfolio Site
  No Credit

0 pts

n/a

(N/A)

n/a

(N/A)

Credit

4 pts

Inclusion of all Components

No Credit

The Google Site does not include all of the following components:
- Wordle of Essay
- Google Doc of Essay
- Video Presentation
- CDP
- Works Cited Page
- Notes and Quotes
(0 pts)
n/a
n/a
Credit

The Google Site includes all of the following components:
- Wordle of Essay
- Google Doc of Essay
- Video Presentation
- CDP
- Works Cited Page
- Notes and Quotes



Keywords:
  • Research Report


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60