Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Rubric for Mesoamerican Digital Research Project
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Rubric for Mesoamerican Digital Research Project
Rubric for Research Report CD
5 Paragraph Essay and Works Cited page, Video, CDP,and E-Portfolio Site
Rubric Code:
L7XAC2
By
ctolnai42
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
History
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Essay
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Introduction
Poor
Introduction does not introduce topic. Essential question is not supported by the these statement.
Fair
Introduction attempts to introduce topic. Points are not obvious. Essential question is vaguely supported by the thesis statement.
Good
Introduction introduces topic but is wordy or too specific. Essential question is supported but not clearly answered by the thesis statement.
Excellent
Introduction is concise and introduces topic in a general but interesting way. Essential questions is clearly answered by the thesis statement.
Organization
Poor
Fails to organize ideas.
Fair
Shows some evidence of an organizational plan.
Good
Uses an identifiable
organizational plan.
Excellent
Establishes a clear and logical organization.
Supporting Details and Explanations
Poor
No supporting details or explanations are provided.
Fair
Some supporting details and explanations are present but inadequate or not connected to your EQ.
Good
There are supporting details and explanations, though some may be missing. Details are included, but may not fully support the EQ.
Excellent
Student details and explains the EQ thoroughly throughout the body paragraphs.
Conclusion
Poor
No conclusion is apparent in the essay.
Fair
Conclusion may be attempted, but does not summarize or restate thesis.
Good
Conclusion provides a summary of supporting points: it is wordy or does not restate the thesis.
Excellent
Conclusion is concise and summarizes supporting points: restates the thesis in a new way.
Research
Poor
Shows little or no research and shows a lack of understanding of the topic.
Fair
Did some research and attempted to create use it in the writing.
Good
Did good research and uses some of the research to explain the topic.
Excellent
Presents thorough research and combines the research with own ideas to explain topic well.
Works Cited Page
Poor
Works Cited Page is not present. (0 pts)
Fair
Good
Works Cited page is present but not formatted properly.
Excellent
Works Cited page is present and formatted properly.
Mechanics of Essay
Mechanics
Poor
Errors are glaring and the essay is difficult to read.
Fair
There are several errors which detract from the overall meaning and flow of the essay.
Good
Some errors are found. They do not detract from the general flow of the essay.
Excellent
Few or no errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization are found.
Flow/Transitions
Poor
No flow to writing. Argument is difficult to follow.
No transitions used.
Fair
Sentences are short or run-ons. Flow of essay is hard to follow.
Little to no transitions used.
Good
Vocabulary or writing style needs further development.
Some basic transitions used.
Excellent
Writing has voice and flows easily.
Appropriate transitions used.
Clarity
Poor
The writing is jumbled and the meaning is not clear to the reader.
Fair
The overall idea is clear, but some points are impossible to understand.
Good
The writing is generally clear, but some sentence structure or vocabulary usage needs improvement.
Excellent
The writing is clear and easy to understand.
Video
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Quality of Content
Poor
The topic of the video is not connected to the EQ or repeats a topic already covered in the essay. The video does not show that the student has engaged the chosen topic critically or personally.
Fair
The topic of the video is connected to the EQ but the video may not show that the student has learned about or engaged the chosen topic critically or uniquely from the written essay.
Good
The topic of the video is clearly connected to the EQ and the video shows that the student has learned about and engaged the chosen topic.
Excellent
The topic of the video is clearly connected to the EQ and the video clearly showcases the extensive student learning and engagement of the chosen topic. The student has designed a unique video presentation.
Creativity
Poor
The student has designed a video presentation that lacks information and creative touches.
Fair
The student has designed an informative video presentation but may not have made it unique or personal.
Good
The student has designed an informative video presentation in a unique and personal way.
Excellent
The student has designed an engaging and informative video presentation in a unique, special, and personal way.
Research
Poor
Shows little or no research and shows a lack of understanding of the topic.
Fair
Did some research and attempted to create use it in the writing.
Good
Did good research and uses some of the research to explain the topic.
Excellent
Presents thorough research and combines the research with own ideas to explain topic well.
Creative Digital Presentation
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Quality of Content
Poor
The topic of the CDP is not connected to the EQ or repeats a topic already covered in the essay. The CDP does not show that the student has engaged the chosen topic critically or personally.
Fair
The topic of the CDP is connected to the EQ but the CDP may not show that the student has learned about or engaged the chosen topic critically or uniquely from the written essay.
Good
The topic of the CDP is clearly connected to the EQ and the CDP shows that the student has learned about and engaged the chosen topic.
Excellent
The topic of the CDP is clearly connected to the EQ and the CDP clearly showcases the extensive student learning and engagement of the chosen topic. The student has designed a unique CDP.
Creativity
Poor
The student has designed a CDP that lacks information and creative touches.
Fair
The student has designed an informative CDP but may not have made it unique or personal.
Good
The student has designed an informative CDP in a unique and personal way.
Excellent
The student has designed an engaging and informative CDP in a unique, special, and personal way.
Research
Poor
Shows little or no research and shows a lack of understanding of the topic.
Fair
Did some research and attempted to create use it in the writing.
Good
Did good research and uses some of the research to explain the topic.
Excellent
Presents thorough research and combines the research with own ideas to explain topic well.
E-Portfolio Site
No Credit
0 pts
n/a
(N/A)
n/a
(N/A)
Credit
4 pts
Inclusion of all Components
No Credit
The Google Site does not include all of the following components:
- Wordle of Essay
- Google Doc of Essay
- Video Presentation
- CDP
- Works Cited Page
- Notes and Quotes
(0 pts)
n/a
n/a
Credit
The Google Site includes all of the following components:
- Wordle of Essay
- Google Doc of Essay
- Video Presentation
- CDP
- Works Cited Page
- Notes and Quotes
Keywords:
Research Report
Subjects:
English
History
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.