iRubric: Ceramic Whistles rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Ceramic Whistles Ceramic Containers Rubric Code: L4WA4A By laiken1018 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Assignment Grade Levels: (none)

Enter rubric title
	Best 21-25 pts (N/A)	Good 16-20 pts (N/A)	Fair 11- 15 pts (N/A)	Poor 10 or less pts (N/A)
Creativity	Best 21-25 pts Totally original design, no element is an exact copy of designs seen in source material.	Good 16-20 pts Most of the whistle elements are unique, but one element may be copied from source material.	Fair 11- 15 pts Some aspects of the whistle are unique, but several elements are copied from source materials or other students.	Poor 10 or less pts The whistle is a copy of a whistle seen in source material or one made by another student (80% or more of elements are copied).
Attractiveness/Craftsmanship	Best 21-25 pts The whistle shows that the creator took great pride in his/her work. The design and construction look carefully planned. The item is neat (free of unwanted bumps, and marks)	Good 16-20 pts The whistle shows that the creator took pride in his/her work. The design and construction look planned. The item has a few areas that could have been improved (unwanted bumps, and marks), but these do not detract from the overall look.	Fair 11- 15 pts The design and construction were planned. The item has several areas that could have been improved (unwanted bumps, and marks) that detract from the over all form.	Poor 10 or less pts The whistle looks thrown together at the last minute. It appears that little design or planning was done. Craftsmanship is poor.
Time and Effort	Best 21-25 pts Class time was used wisely. Much time and effort went into the planning and design of the whistle. It is clear the student worked hard.	Good 16-20 pts Class time was used wisely. The student could have put more time and effort in planning.	Fair 11- 15 pts Class time was not always used wisely, but student did do some planning.	Poor 10 or less pts Class time was not used wisely and the student put in no additional effort.
Texture and Design	Best 21-25 pts The whistle clearly has two different textures, which completes the overall look of the form.	Good 16-20 pts The whistle clearly two different textures that could have been better thought out, but it does not cause too much distraction.	Fair 11- 15 pts The whistle has only one or maybe two textures, which could have been thought out better to complete the form. The textures may be distracting.	Poor 10 or less pts The whistle does not have texture and the form is not complete.
Functioning Whistle- 3 extra pts	Best 21-25 pts The whistle functions clearly.	Good 16-20 pts The whistle functions but not as clearly as possible.	Fair 11- 15 pts The whistle makes little sound.	Poor 10 or less pts The whistle makes not sound.