Skip to main content

iRubric: Unit 1 Internet Assignment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Unit 1 Internet Assignment 
This rubric is for the Unit 1 Internet Assignment
Rubric Code: L47CW9
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Internet Assignment 1
Enter rubric description
  Needs Improvement

0 pts

Meets Requirements

2 pts

Exceeds Expectations

4 pts

Sources

Two sources: newspaper articles, one from the UK and one from the US, describing situations of health care rationing as "rationing" would be defined by an economist

Needs Improvement

Student did not find two sources as specified our sources were not from newspapers as specified in the assignment
Meets Requirements

Sources were from newspapers as specified, generally met the requirements, and were relevant to the assignment
Exceeds Expectations

Sources were from two different newspapers as specified and addressed two highly relevant examples of health care rationing that fit well together when used as the basis of this assignment
Length / Style

Word limit - 500 words in 3 paragraphs

Needs Improvement

The length was far too short for the assignment or far too long (far exceeding 500 word limit)
Meets Requirements

The length was generally appropriate, but the writer in some cases could have added more or trimmed words to better convey a point
Exceeds Expectations

The length was completely appropriate for the assignment and was neither too brief nor too wordy
Summarization of Article Examples

Summarize the instances of rationing and discuss whether they are more or less similar or different situations

Needs Improvement

The writer fails to summarize both articles clearly or does not attempt to draw lines of similarity or dissimilarity between them
Meets Requirements

The writer summarizes both articles and describes ways in which the situations are generally similar or different
Exceeds Expectations

The summarization of the situations described in the article clearly establishes lines of similarity or dissimilarity between the situations and provides insight into the nature of these similarities/differences
Identifying External Players

Identify whether any external government, private sector, or other organizational players made the “rationing” decision and if so, how that impacted the situation.

Needs Improvement

The writer fails to identify external players or identifies such players incorrectly
Meets Requirements

External players are identified and the impact of at least one player on the situation is described
Exceeds Expectations

All external players are identified and the writer provides analysis of how these players impacted the rationing situation and/or decision
Equity and Efficiency

Discuss the impact of the situations you identified on the efficiency and equity of health care in these cases

Needs Improvement

The writer does not identify the impact on efficiency and/or equity
Meets Requirements

Efficiency and equity in health care systems are discussed and tied into the situations described in the article.
Exceeds Expectations

The writer not only describes how equity and efficiency were affected by this situation, but goes on to see the "big picture" in how equity and efficiency are related to health care rationing, drawing larger conclusions.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202