Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Supreme Court Case-Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Supreme Court Case-Presentation
Supreme Court Case-Presentation
Supreme Court Case with history and significance.
Rubric Code:
L2W823X
By
Garryshultz
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Law
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Case Study Presentation
Poor
0-1 points
0 pts
Fair
2 points
0 pts
Average
3 points
0 pts
Good
4 points
0 pts
Exemplary
5 points
0 pts
Met Assignment Crtieria
Overall Performance
Poor
The student did not meet the expectations of this assignment.
Fair
The student met few of the expectations of this assignment.
Average
The student did not meet all expectations set in the assignment.
Good
The student clearly understood the assignment and met the expectations.
Exemplary
The student clearly understood the assignment and exceeded the expectations.
Case Information
Case Facts & Background
Poor
Identifies & understands almost none of the basic information or lower court trials
Fair
Identifies & understands few of the basic case facts and lower court trials
Average
Identifies & understands some of the case facts and lower court trials
Good
Identifies & understands most of the case facts and lower court trials
Exemplary
Identifies & understands the case, the parties involved, the time frame, the lower court trials, and the reason it was heard at the Supreme Court.
Effects of Case
Poor
Analysis was only provided of the effects of the case
Fair
Marginal analysis of of the effects of the case
Average
Somewhat thorough analysis of the effects of the case
Good
Reasonably thorough analysis of each the effects of the case
Exemplary
Very thorough and insightful analysis of each the effects of the case
Decision
Poor
The final decision was not included.
Fair
N/A
Average
The final decision was included without any additional details.
Good
The final recommendation was shared , including the tally of concurring and dissenting votes, but additional information was ommited.
Exemplary
Explained the decision of the court, explaining the concurring and dissenting votes and the final recommendation.
Design & Presentation
Poor
The slides are poorly designed, confusing to read, and don't complement what the speaker is saying.
Fair
Some slides are clearly designed, but most are confusing or confusing to the view due to layout or text.
Average
Slides are somewhate clearly designed, but some are confusing to read or don't make sense in the presentation.
Good
Slides are designed clearly, but speakers put too much information directly onto slide rather than using slides to highlight.
Exemplary
Slides are designed clearly. <BR>
Speakers supplement slides with information, rather than just reading to the audience from the screen.
Powerpoint Length
Poor
The powerpoint contained less than 10 slides and no works cited was present.
Fair
N/A
Average
N/A
Good
The powerpoint contained at least 10 slides with a works cited at the end, but some MLA formatting errors were present.
Exemplary
The powerpoint contained at least 10 slides. The works cited slide was the final one was correctly formatted according to MLA standards.
Oral Presentation Style
Poor
The speaker didn't seem to know more than what was already typed on the slides.
Fair
Speaker was confusing to the audience. They seemed to know about the case, but struggled to make the information clear to the audience.
Average
Speaker was somewhat clear in their presention. Hesitation and/or volume control issues made some parts of the presentation difficult to understand.
Good
Speaker was mostly clear and usually knew what they were saying. Some hesitation or volume control issues occured.
Exemplary
Speaker was clear and well-informed. When the teacher or audience asked questions, the presenters were able to reply coherently.
Subjects:
Business
Law
Types:
Exam
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.