Skip to main content

iRubric: Model of Enzyme Activity rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Model of Enzyme Activity 
Each student will design, demonstrate, and explain an original model of enzyme activity.
Rubric Code: L26BC5
By PhyllisBaker
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Enzyme Model Presentation
Each student will be assessed on completeness and accaracy of the model, the quality of and effort reflected in the work, the style and creativity of the presentation, as well as body language and vocal quality.
  Poor

4 pts

Fair

6 pts

Good

8 pts

Exemplary

10 pts

Points

(N/A)

The Model
1 pts

All assigned aspects of the model are included and are represented correctly in relationship to each other. The model "works" to enhance the understanding of the audience.
Poor

The model was 50% or more incomplete. The student was not able to accurately explain many of the relationships. The model did not help to enhance understanding of the concepts of enzyme activity for the audience.
Fair

The student left one or two of the major elements of the model but correctly explained the relationships of those he/she did include. Although some aspects were left out, the model was original and successfully improved the understanding of enzyme activity for the audience.
Good

The student included the major elements of the model and correctly explained their relationships. Although some aspects were left out, the model was original and successfully improved the understanding of enzyme activity for the audience.
Exemplary

The student included all elements of the model and the concepts of inhibition. He/She correctly explained all relationships of the model. The model was completely original and "worked" to improve the understanding of enzyme activity for the audience.
Points
Work Quality/Effort
1 pts

The work done demonstrates full effort that the student is proud of. The quality that was put into this task is the best it can be by the student.
Poor

The work is done with little effort, quality is not what the student is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.
Fair

Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the student is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.
Good

The work was done with good effort that is reflected in the quality of the product. The outcome shows what the student is capable of. It is evident that time was put into developing this model.
Exemplary

The quality of work done exceeded expectations and showed that the student is proud of his/her effort. The effort that was put into this task is the best that it can be for the student.
Points
Style/Creativity
1 pts

The manner in which the student presents the model demonstrates an element of style and reflects a major degree of creativity.
Poor

The student showed very little personal style and almost no creativity during the presentation. The audience didnot respond in a manner that indicated engagement or interest.
Fair

The student showed some degree of personality and creativity. He/She managed to hold the attention of the audience for most of the presentattion.
Good

The student showed a good amount of creativity and style in the delivery of the presentation. The audience seemed entertained as well as inlightened by the presenter.
Exemplary

The student presented the model with a high level of distinct style and creativity. The presentation was more than a list of facts and demonstrated a clear unstanding of the concepts.
Points
Body Language/Vocal Quality
1 pts

The student stands up straight, looks confident, and makes eye contact during the presentation. The student speaks clearly the entire time and has no difficulty pronouncing words. Volume is loud enough to be heard by all members of the audience.
Poor

The student slouched and/or did not look at the audience during the presentation. He/She was hard to understand, often mumbled and seemed not to understand some of the words. Volume also affected the ability of the audience to understand the majority of the presentation.
Fair

The student lacked good posture and often made poor eye contact during the presentation. The student rarely spoke clearly which affected the audience understanding. Volume was often too soft to be heard by all audience members.
Good

The student stood up straight and gave some eye contact. The student spoke clearly most of the time with very little difficulty pronuncing words. Volume was loud enough to be heard by all audience members for most of the presentation.
Exemplary

The student exhibited the maximum expected in body language and vocal quality through out the entire presentation.
Points



Keywords:
  • Enzyme, Substrate, Enzyme-Substrate Complex, Products, Active Site, Competitive and Noncompetitive Inhibitors

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178