Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: ERM101 and ERM202 Class Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
ERM101 and ERM202 Class Project
Writing Assignments Rubric
Use of this rubric for grading undergraduate Emergency Management student writing assignments.
Rubric Code:
KX79699
By
pagcaian
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
ERM101 and ERM202 Class Project
Exemplary
20 pts
Satisfactory
12 pts
Needs Improvement
6 pts
No Submission
0 pts
Content & Development
Exemplary
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Research is adequate, timely and addresses course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Satisfactory
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Research is adequate
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Needs Improvement
- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
No Submission
The class project was not submitted.
Organization & Structure
Exemplary
- Structure of the paragraph is clear and easy to follow.
Satisfactory
- Structure of the paragraph is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions adequately.
Needs Improvement
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraph is disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
No Submission
The class project was not submitted.
Format & Citation
Exemplary
- Paper follows designated
guidelines.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
- Consistently applies the
approved standards relating
to APA where appropriate to
the assigned writing.
Satisfactory
- Paper generally follows guidelines.
- Paper is over/ under
length.
- Applies the approved
standards relating to
APA as they apply to the
assigned writing.
Needs Improvement
- Paper lacks many elements of correct formattting.
- Paragrpah is inadequate/excessive in length.
- Neglects to apply
required APA format
or applies several
standards incorrectly.
No Submission
The class project was not submitted.
Applied Research
Exemplary
- Smartly incorporates published After Action Reports, Lessons Learned data or results of peer reviewed case studies.
- Deftly includes relevant information from multiple sources: Peer reviewed journals in Humanitarian, Health/Medical, Psychosocial Sciences, Environmental /Engineering.
Satisfactory
- Appropriately incorporates published After Action Reports, Lessons Learned data or results of peer reviewed case studies.
- data adeqautely supports the writers assertion.
- Relies on information from within the First Responder , Emergency Management / Homeland Security information resources/ journals.
Needs Improvement
- Does not incorporate After Action, Lesson Learned or Case Studies as described for the assignment.
- cites data that is inconclusive
or does not support the topic. .
No Submission
The class project was not submitted.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
Exemplary
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
- Uses NIMS standardized
language and acronyms without over reliance to make point.
Satisfactory
- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
- Uses NIMS standardized language and acronyms appropriately.
Needs Improvement
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
- Uses Agency or Core Competency specific acronyms.
- Overuse of NIMS standardized language and acronyms.
No Submission
The class project was not submitted.
Keywords:
NIMS, Emergency Management
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.