Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Personality Presentation rubric

iRubric: Personality Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Personality Presentation Personality Presentation Group presentation on Personality Theories Rubric Code: KCW728 By judycolson Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Psychology Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Content Presentation
	Poor 3 pts	Adequate 5 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Overall aesthetics	Poor Background makes the presentation hard to read. Graphics are confusing and not related to words. Too much movement in the slides. Many slides hard to read.	Adequate There are too few graphic elements. Appropriate background. Some slides are hard to read.	Good Appealing graphic elements are included appropriately. Slides are readable, but wordy. Annimations are used, but are sometimes distracting.	Excellent Appealing graphic elements are included appropriately. Slides are easy to read and annimations are used effectively.
Mechanics	Poor There are many errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is not consistent or clear. Too much information on many slides.	Adequate There are some (4-5) errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is not consistent on a few slides. Too much information on four or more slides.	Good There are infrequent (1-2) errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Bullet format is consistent on all slides. Too much information on two or more slides.	Excellent There are no errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. Bullets are consistent and clear. Information is clear and concise on each slide.
Presentation skills	Poor Two or more of the presenters didn't know the information and got lost often. Diction and voice level made listening difficult. Presnters read all their notes and fail to make eye contact with audience.	Adequate One presenter didn't know the information and they got lost often. Diction and voice level made listening difficult for the audience. Presenters mostly read notes and make infrequent eye contact with audience.	Good All presenters knew the information and only got lost on occassion. Diction and voice level made listening easy for the audience. Presenters mostly maintained eye contact with the audience, and referenced their notes on occasion.	Excellent All presenters knew the information and progressed smoothly through the presentation. Diction and voice level engaged the audience in the presentation. Presenters maintain eye contact with audience, seldom returneing to their notes.
Expert Connections	Poor Information presented is entirely inaccruate. No examples are given to help audience members apply terms and concepts.	Adequate Information presented is somewhat accurate. A few examples are given to help audience members apply terms and concepts.	Good Information presented is entirely accurate. Presenters offer many examples and often elborate on, extend, and explain information to audience members.	Excellent Information presented is entirely accurate. Presenters have demonstrated the meaning of material by correctly elaborating, extending and explaining information to audience members.
Analysis	Poor Personality theory was presented without focus. Demonstrated very little understanding. Failed to present the relation between the topic area and the analysis.	Adequate Personality theory was presented and analyzed. It demonstrated adequate knowledge about the topic area. Relation between the topic area and analysis was weak.	Good Personality theory was portrayed and showed good understanding. The relation between the topic area and analysis was clear.	Excellent Personality theory was correctly portrayed and analyzed and demonstrated clear knowledge and depth of meaning. The relation between the topic area and analysis was clear and strong.
Group Facilitating Skills	Poor Presenters do not have grasp of information; presenters cannot answer questions about subject matter.	Adequate Presenters are at ease with expected answers to most questions, but fail to elaborate on question answers.	Good Presenters are at ease with expected answers to most quetions and ellobrate on most question answers.	Excellent Presenters demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Presentation Length
	Poor 1 pts	Adequate 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Graphic Organizer	Poor Graphic organizer had a few key principles, and ideas, vocabulary and people. Lacked many details and organization.	Adequate Graphic organizer had many key principles, some main ideas, some vocabulary, and important people.	Good Graphic organizer had key principles, main ideas, vocabulary, and important people. Looked good.	Excellent Graphic organizer was complete with key principles, main ideas, vocabulary, and important people. Comprehensive organized and easy to read.

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Math rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n60