Skip to main content
iRubric: Analysis Essay Rubric

iRubric: Analysis Essay Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Analysis Essay Rubric 
This rubric can be used to assess and score any kind of literary analysis essay for students in grades 7-12.
Rubric Code: KA8469
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Literary Analysis Essay
  Poor

6 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

8 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Totals:

(N/A)

Ideas and content

Poor

• Focus on topic is not clearly defined.
• Limited or disconnected details show a lack of understanding.
• Approach is common.
* No connections or insights made in essay
Fair

• Focus on topic is somewhat defined.
• Underdeveloped details show little knowledge and are too general to create a picture.
• Fresh approach to topic is attempted yet lacks support which will aid the reader’s understanding
Good

• Focus on topic is clear.
• Sufficient details create a picture showing some knowledge and insight.
• Fresh approach adds to the readers understanding and some good insights are made
Excellent

• Focus on topic is clear and definite
• Effective and appropriate details create a vivid picture showing knowledge and insight
• Fresh approach holds the reader’s attention; insights are relevant and useful to the reader's understanding of the topic the writer is exploring.
Totals:
Organization

Poor

• The writing lacks a clear sense of direction. Ideas are strung together in a loose fashion.
• Not title is present.
• Sequencing of details is not clear.
• Transitions are evident.
Fair

• The organization structure is somewhat effective but reader may be confused at times.
• The title is present but uninspired
• Sequencing of details is limited.
• Transitions are limited.
Good

• The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the essay without too much confusion.
• The title is original but does not clearly capture the central theme.
• Sequencing of details is logical.
• Transitions attempt to tie the ideas of the paper together.
Excellent

• The organization enhances the central theme or idea and allows reader to move easily through the essay.
• The title is original and captures the central theme of the essay.
• Sequence of detail is effective and logical.
• Transitions effectively tie the ideas of the paper together.
Totals:
Voice/word choice

Poor

• Writer’s personality is not evident.
• Commitment to topic is lacking.
• The development of the topic is so limited that the writing evokes minimal emotion in the reader.
• Limited vocabulary for words to create a picture.
• Verb and noun choice is rather general. Adjectives and phrases lack definition.
• Language choice and phrasing is inappropriate, repetitive, or lacks meaning.
Fair

• Writer’s personality is undefined; writing is cautious.
• Commitment to topic is limited.
• The writing is somewhat sincere but doesn’t reflect unique or individual perspective on the topic therefore evoking limited emotion in the reader
• Ordinary word choice attempts to create a picture in the reader’s mind.
• Verbs, nouns, adjectives, and phrases are adequate.
• Language choice and phrasing lack inspiration.
Good

• Writer’s personality pokes through; confidence and feeling fade in and out.
• A commitment to the topic is apparent.
• The writing is somewhat engaging for the reader and evokes some emotion.
• Correct, adequate word choice creates a clear picture in the reader’s mind.
• Lively verbs, specific nouns, and appropriate adjectives and phrases add to the meaning.
• Dialogue, if used, sounds appropriate.
Excellent

• The writer’s personality is expressed; confidence and feeling are apparent.
• Individual, powerful commitment to the topic is obvious.
• The writing is honest, personal, and engaging and makes the reader think about and react to the author’s ideas.
Totals:
Writing conventions

Poor

• A minimal grasp of standard writing conventions is apparent.
• Numerous errors in conventions distract and/or confuse the reader.
*Single space.
Use of first and second person pronouns
Fair

• A basic grasp of the standard writing conventions is apparent.
• Errors in conventions may impair readability.
*Some uses of second person pronouns
Good

• A strong grasp of the standard writing conventions is apparent: capitalization is correct, punctuation is smooth and enhances meaning, spelling is essentially correct, grammar and usage are generally correct.
*Mostly uses third person pronouns.
Excellent

• A strong grasp of standard writing conventions is apparent: capitalization is accurate, punctuation is smooth and enhances meaning, spelling is correct, grammar is essentially correct.
*Uses third person pronouns throughout the essay.
Totals:
MLA Format/citations

Poor

*No source citations.
*MLA name heading is incorrect.
*Single spaced
Fair

*Some source citations, but incorrectly written.
*MLA name heading is half correct.
*Double spaced, but paragraphs are not indented.
*Title is in bold or underlined
Good

*Most source citations present.
*MLA name heading is almost right.
*Double spaced with few minor format errors.
*Title has some typed errors (bold, underlined)
Excellent

*All sources cited correctly.
*MLA heading is correct.
*Double spaced with little to no errors.
*Title is centered
Totals:
Peer Reviewed (When Applicable)

Poor

The paper was not peer reviewed in class.
Fair

The paper was peer reviewed but there was little to no effort made to make changes.
Good

The paper was peer reviewed and adequate changes were made to it.
Excellent

The paper was peer reviewed and the necessary changes were made to improve the paper.
Totals:



Keywords:
  • rubric, literary analysis, essay, critical writing

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60