Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Oral/Multimedia Presenation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Oral/Multimedia Presenation
Students will create a multimedia or visual presentation on a literary topic. Students will be assessed on their oral communication skills.
Rubric Code:
K776B6
By
ShenitraDees
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Oral Presenation
30 %
Above Standard
5 pts
Meets Standard
3.5 pts
Below Standard
1.5 pts
Not Evident
0.5 pts
Total Points
(N/A)
Cover Slide
5 %
Above Standard
The coveains the slide contains the person's name, class, title of subject and a visual that is connected to the content of the presentation.
Meets Standard
Cover slide contains the person's name, class, title of subject and a visual.
Below Standard
Cover slide is missing one or more elements and does not contain a visual
Not Evident
No cover slide
Total Points
Overview Slide
5 %
Above Standard
The overview slide provides a clear, detailed outline of the major ideas explored in the presentation.
It is organized and succint.
Meets Standard
The overview slide provides a clear outline of the major ideas explored in the presentation.
Below Standard
The overview slide is present, but doesnot give clear directives of the major ideas explored in the presentation.
Not Evident
There is no overview slide.
Total Points
Use of Graphics/Visual Aids
5 %
Above Standard
All graphics and/or visual aids are clearly readable and the appropriate size and color for the audience to see and support the theme/content of the presentation.
Meets Standard
All graphics and/or visual aids are the appropriate size and color for the audience and support the theme/content of the presentation
Below Standard
All graphics are appropriate but a one-three of the graphics do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation.
Not Evident
No graphics or present of the presentations contains too many graphics that distract the audience from the content.
Total Points
Text-Font Choice & Formatting
5 %
Above Standard
Font formats (e.g. color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content of the presentation.
Meets Standard
Font formats have been carefully choosen to enhance readability to complement the content.
Below Standard
Font formatting has been carefully choosen to enhance readability to complement the content, but is hard to read.
Not Evident
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material.
Total Points
Sequencing of Information
5 %
Above Standard
Information is organized a a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next card or slide. Transitions are used skillful to make connections from one point to the next point throughout the presentation.
Meets Standard
Information is organized a a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next card or slide. Transitions are used.
Below Standard
Information is logically sequenced. And occassional card or slide of information seems out of place. One or two transitions are used.
Not Evident
There are no clear plans for the organization of information. No transitions have ben used.
Total Points
Grammar and Spelling
5 %
Above Standard
The presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors. Slides use a combination of bulleted sentences and or phrases that are uniform.
Meets Standard
The presentation has one-two misspellings or grammatical errors. Slides use a combination of bulleted sentences and or phrases that are uniform.
Below Standard
The presentation has three-four misspellings or grammatical errors. Slides contains paragrpahs and/or incomplete sentences that are not uniform.
Not Evident
The presentation has more than four grammatical errors and/or misspellings throughout the presentation.
Total Points
Category
60 %
Above Standard
20 pts
Meets Standard
15 pts
Below Standard
10 pts
Not Evident
5 pts
Total Points
(N/A)
Content Accuracy
20 %
Above Standard
The thesis or main idea is clearly stated or identifiable.All the content throughout the presentation is accurate and supports the thesis. There are no factual errors.
Meets Standard
The thesis or main idea is clearly stated or identifiable. Parts of the content are accurate but there are one or two pieces that may be inaccurate.
Below Standard
The thesis or main idea is hard to decipher.The content is generally accurate, but one or more pieces of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate.
Not Evident
No thesis or main idea is presented. Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error.
Total Points
Citations Within Work
20 %
Above Standard
All quotes, pictures, and apraphrases have been properly cited according to the 2009 MLA citation requirements.
Meets Standard
One or two quotes, charts/tables, pictures, and paraphrases have not been properly cited according to the APA/ MLA citation requirements.
Below Standard
Three or more quotes, chart/tables, pictures, and paraphrases have not been properly cited according to the APA/MLA citation requirements.
Not Evident
No quotes, chart/tables, pictures, and paraphrases have not been properly cited according to the APA/MLA citation requirements
Total Points
Works Cited
20 %
Above Standard
All cources are documented correctly according to APA/MLA formatting requirements on the works cited page.
Meets Standard
One or two sources are not documented correctly according to the APA/MLA formatting requirements on the works cited page.
Below Standard
Three to four sources are not documented correctly according to the APA/MLA formatting requirements on the works cited page.
Not Evident
There is no works cited page.
Total Points
Category
30 %
Above Standard
10 pts
Meets Standard
8 pts
Below Standard
6 pts
Net Evident
2 pts
Total Points
(N/A)
Oral Presentation
10 %
Above Standard
The speaker uses appropriate pitch, pacing, and tone throughout the entire presentation. Student does not rely on notecards. The speaker uses appropriate non-verbal ques. The speaker is poised, articulate, and knowledgeable of the content.
Meets Standard
The speaker uses appropriate pitch, pacing, and tone throughout the entire presentation. Student relies on notecards. The speaker uses appropriate non-verbal ques. The speaker is poised, articulate, and knowledgeable of the content.
Below Standard
The speaker uses inconsistent pitch, pacing, and tone throughout the entire presentation. Student relies heavily on notecards/slides. The speaker uses inappropriate non-verbal ques.The speaking is inappropriately mobile, inarticulate, and unsure the content.
Net Evident
The student speaks to the display/screen and does nto address the audience. The speaker uses inappropriate non-verbal ques.The speaking is inappropriately mobile, inarticulate, and unsure the content.
Total Points
Professional Attire
10 %
Above Standard
Student's attire is appropriate for the class presentation. Student is fully compliant with the school uniform policy.
Meets Standard
Below Standard
Student's attire is appropriate for the class presentation, but assessories are a destraction.
Net Evident
Student's atire is inappropriate for presentation. Student is non-compliant with the school uniform policy.
Total Points
Effectiveness of Presentation
10 %
Above Standard
Project includes all material needed to gain a compfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective study guide. The presentation is five to ten minutes long.
Meets Standard
Project includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the material, but is lacking one or two key elemenets. It would be an adequate study guide. The presentation is five to ten minutes long.
Below Standard
Project is missing more than two key elements. It would be an incomplete study guide. The presentation is less than three minutes long.
Net Evident
Project is lacking several key elements and ahs inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide. The presentation is less than two minutes long.
Total Points
Keywords:
English, Oral Communication
Subjects:
English
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.