Skip to main content

iRubric: English 026 Literary Analysis Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
English 026 Literary Analysis Essay 
Rubric Code: K74BA5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Rubric: Literary Analysis Essay
  Exceeds

4 pts

Meets

3 pts

Fair/Adequate

2 pts

Does not meet

1 pts

MLA format and citations

Exceeds

The student uses MLA format correctly and cites all quoted or paraphrased passages and sources correctly. In addition, student includes a Works Cited page that is formatted correctly.
Meets

The student uses MLA format correctly most of the time; mostly cites all quoted or paraphrased passages and sources correctly. Works Cited page is, for the most part, formatted correctly.
Fair/Adequate

Some parts of MLA format are correct and some are not; quoted or paraphrased passages are cited but not cited correctly. Works Cited page is included but is formatted incorrectly.
Does not meet

Student does not use correct MLA format and/or does not cite quoted or paraphrased passages; there may be evidence of plagiarism. No Works Cited page is included.
Grammar, Mechanics, and Spelling

Exceeds

There are few or no errors in mechanics, usage, grammar or spelling. The title of the work and evidence from the work are correctly capitalized and punctuated throughout.
Meets

There are some errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling. Most conventions related to capitalizing and punctuating the title of the work and supplying evidence from the work are followed.
Fair/Adequate

There are several errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling that affect clarity. Only some of the conventions related to capitalizing and punctuating the title of the work and supplying evidence from the work are followed.
Does not meet

There are many serious errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, and spelling which affect the clarity of the essay severely . Few or none of the conventions related to capitalizing and punctuating the title of the work and supplying evidence from the work are followed.
Introduction/Thesis

Exceeds

Intro engages the reader, introduces textual issues, and leads effectively to the thesis; thesis clearly stated in one sentence that contains a position and a rationale; thesis exhibits analytical thinking, engagement with the topic, and complexity, texts, authors referenced.
Meets

Intro leads reader to the thesis; thesis is clearly stated and contains a position and a rationale, but one or the other may not be effective; exhibits some analytical thinking, texts, authors, and issues referenced.
Fair/Adequate

Intro leads the reader to the thesis; thesis is present but lacks clarity and analytical thinking; texts and authors may be named.
Does not meet

Intro fails to adequately tie into thesis; thesis is unclear and underdeveloped; texts, authors, and issues are not referenced.
Organization & Analysis

Exceeds

Essay begins with clear intro and thesis, paragraphs begin with topic sentences, relate to the thesis, and contain appropriately organized quotes. Transitions are consistently used. Conclusion relates to thesis, but does not merely summarize; it leaves the reader with food for thought.
Meets

Essay begins with intro and thesis, most supporting paragraphs relate to thesis, and sometimes offer textual support. Transitions are used but are sometimes abrupt. Conclusion sums up argument and relates to thesis.
Fair/Adequate

Essay begins with intro and thesis, supporting paragraphs list ideas presented in thesis. There are few quotes or quotes are incorrectly executed. Some transitions are used. Conclusion mostly connects to thesis.
Does not meet

Essay begins with intro, thesis is not clearly present. Paragraphs are not well developed; no quotes or textual references are included; conclusion does not connect to thesis.
Writing Process

Exceeds

Student participated in all activities related to the writing process: peer review that includes active engagement with the work of peers, and proof of visit to the Writing Center. Student turns in final draft, rough draft, peer review sheets, Writing Center form, and additional (unrequired) drafts. Met the page requirement.
Meets

Student participated in all activities related to the writing process and gave peers some helpful commentary. Student turns in final copy, rough draft, and Writing Center form. Met page requirement.
Fair/Adequate

Student participated in some activities related to the writing process; put little effort in the peer review process; student turns in final copy, rough draft, and Writing Center form. Page requirement is met.
Does not meet

Student did not participate in any activities related to the writing process. Student turns in only the final copy; paper may be late. Page requirement may not have been met.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202