Skip to main content
iRubric: Comparison of Company Employee Benefits and Work Environment rubric

iRubric: Comparison of Company Employee Benefits and Work Environment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Comparison of Company Employee Benefits and Work Environment 
Comparison of Company Employee Benefits and Work Environment
Together choose 2 companies headquartered in the greater Seattle area, (Amazon, Microsoft, Starbucks, Alaska Airlines, Safeco, Nordstrom, etc.) Compare the companies employee benefit packages, interview or research to discover as much as you can about each company’s work environment. Create a chart, graph or other visual that can be posted in the class for students to peruse. Document references.
Rubric Code: K67475
By clcangioni
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Comparison of Company Employee Bene
Together choose 2 companies headquartered in the greater Seattle area, (Amazon, Microsoft, Starbucks, Alaska Airlines, Safeco, Nordstrom, etc.) Compare the companies employee benefit packages, interview or research to discover as much as you can about each company’s work environment. Create a chart, graph or other visual that can be posted in the class for students to peruse. Document references.
  Poor

55 pts

Fair

75 pts

Good

85 pts

Outstanding

100 pts

Score

(N/A)

Benefit Content
25 %

Each company's employee benefits are detailed.
Poor

--2 or fewer sources --Source reliablility questionable. Some sources not cited.Omitted information interferes with ability of reader to find the source. --Little information relevant to conclusion. --Insufficient information provided to support conclusion
--Minimal research.
Fair

--Failed to cite 4 sources --Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source. --Some information relevant to conclusion
--Information provided to support some elements of conclusion
--Surface research.
Good

-- Cited 4 sources --Source reliability adequate. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source. --Some information relevant to conclusion
--Information provided to support some elements of conclusion
-Adequate research.
Outstanding

--Cited 4 sources --Source reliability excellent. No omitted information
-- Information relevant to conclusion
--Information provided to support all elements of conclusion
Exemplary research.
Score
Work Environment Content
25 %

Similarities and differences of each company's work environment are detailed
Poor

--2 or fewer sources --Source reliablility questionable. Some sources not cited.Omitted information interferes with ability of reader to find the source. --Little information relevant to conclusion. --Insufficient information provided to support conclusion
--Minimal research
Fair

--Failed to cite 4 sources --Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source. --Some information relevant to conclusion
--Information provided to support some elements of conclusion
--Surface research.
Good

-- Cited 4 sources --Source reliability adequate. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source. --Some information relevant to conclusion
--Information provided to support some elements of conclusion
-Adequate research.
Outstanding

--Cited 4 sources --Source reliability excellent. No omitted information
-- Information relevant to conclusion
--Information provided to support all elements of conclusion
Exemplary research
Score
Critical evaluation
25 %

Benefits are fully compared and contrasted. With a conclusion regarding which company offers the best package to employees
Poor

Visual demonstrates a poor evel of Critical Evaluation and thinking about the benefits presented in the research.
Evidence not identified or evaluated.
-Conclusion is based on personal opinion of topic
Fair

Visual demonstrates a fair level of Critical Evaluation and thinking about the benefits presented in the research.
-Evidence is either not identified or not evaluated.
-Conclusion is not based on the evaluation of the evidence.
Good

Visual demonstrates a good level of Critical Evaluation and thinking about the employee benefits presented in the research.
-Evidence is identified and evaluated.
-Conclusion is based on the evaluation of the evidence; may present some opionion on topic
Outstanding

Visual demonstrates outstanding level of Critical Evaluation and thinking about the benefits presented in the research.
-Evidence is well identified and evaluated.
-Conclusion is based solely on the evaluation of the evidence.
Score
Creatvity
25 %

Visual is well
Poor

Poster Board presentation very poor
Few pictures
Paper poorly typed
Only internet pictures.
Fair

Poster Board/Visual presentation below average
Few picutres only showing business inside and outside
Paper typed
Good

Poster Board/Visual presentation average
pictures of business inside and outside plus some showing certain things needed to improve business benefits.
Paper typed
Outstanding

Poster Board/Visual presentation Highest Quality. Contains
many pictures that show a complete grasp of the business benefits.
Score




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60