Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Annotated Bibliography Annotated Bibliography Annotated Bibliography. Rubric Code: K5C5CB By euge620 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Humanities Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Annotated Bibliography Paper
	Ecellent 4 pts	Strongly Developing 3 pts	Good 2 pts	Not acceptable 1 pts
Overall Format	Ecellent Followed Detailed Assignment Sheet, formatting,and MLA guide with few to no errors	Strongly Developing Concerted but developing attempt to follow academic-level research, formatting, and MLA guide with noted major errors	Good Hasty work lacking detail, with formatting errors.	Not acceptable Limited attempt to adhere to academic standards.
Topic Complexity	Ecellent Topic has been thought out, developed, sufficiently narrowed, and serves as basis for serious academic research	Strongly Developing Simple topic with beginning level of depth, limited research potential, or not up to serious academic consdieration	Good Topic has limited academic research potential or is hastily composed	Not acceptable Little or no attempt to select appropriate topic for academic research or serious lack of rigor
Thesis Statement	Ecellent Rigorous academic thesis can easily be arrived at using bibliographic summaries	Strongly Developing Rigorous academic thesis attempted but might not be evident in bibliographic summaries	Good Thesis too broad or does not lend itself either to serious academic research	Not acceptable Thesis unclear based on bibliographic summaries; little or no rigorous effort
Citation Summaries
	Excellent Summary has good analysis and depth, shows good understanding of material 5 pts	Needs Improvement Summary has some analysis, but lacks depth, shows some understanding of material 3 pts	Poor Summary lacks analysis or depth, shows no understanding of material 2 pts	Average Summary has sufficient analysis and depth, shows some understanding of material 4 pts
Reference 1: Book	Excellent Summary provides source, summary, relevance, and qualitative assessment for topic under consideration	Needs Improvement Summary is generally acceptable, though may not contain all elements necessary for continued, focused research	Poor Summary is missing components, is too vague, or does not lend itself to further inquiry	Average Summary is incomplete, does not adhere to academically rigorous standards, or does not provide scaffold for further research; little or no effort
Reference 2: Book	Excellent Summary provides source, summary, relevance, and qualitative assessment for topic under consideration	Needs Improvement Summary is generally acceptable, though may not contain all elements necessary for continued, focused research	Poor Summary is missing components, is too vague, or does not lend itself to further inquiry	Average Summary is incomplete, does not adhere to academically rigorous standards, or does not provide scaffold for further research; little or no effort
Reference 3: On-line	Excellent Summary provides source, summary, relevance, and qualitative assessment for topic under consideration	Needs Improvement Summary is generally acceptable, though may not contain all elements necessary for continued, focused research	Poor Summary is missing components, is too vague, or does not lend itself to further inquiry	Average Summary is incomplete, does not adhere to academically rigorous standards, or does not provide scaffold for further research; little or no effort
Reference 4: On-line	Excellent Summary provides source, summary, relevance, and qualitative assessment for topic under consideration	Needs Improvement Summary is generally acceptable, though may not contain all elements necessary for continued, focused research	Poor Summary is missing components, is too vague, or does not lend itself to further inquiry	Average Summary is incomplete, does not adhere to academically rigorous standards, or does not provide scaffold for further research; little or no effort
Reference 5: Print	Excellent Summary provides source, summary, relevance, and qualitative assessment for topic under consideration	Needs Improvement Summary is generally acceptable, though may not contain all elements necessary for continued, focused research	Poor Summary is missing components, is too vague, or does not lend itself to further inquiry	Average Summary is incomplete, does not adhere to academically rigorous standards, or does not provide scaffold for further research; little or no effort

Subjects:

Humanities

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Humanities rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n232