Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Wuthering Heights Summer Reading Critical Thinking Essays rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Wuthering Heights Summer Reading Critical Thinking Essays
Rubric Code:
K5BC49
By
kmarcott
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
ESSAY
Distinguished
3 pts
Accomplished
2.5 pts
Proficient
2 pts
Developing
1.5 pts
Emerging
1 pts
No Score
0 pts
Analysis
Distinguished
Response reflects a high-order critical, analytical understanding of the text; using clear reasoning, the response is constructed of sophisticated, insightful inferences from concrete textual details; inferences are developed & articulated so that all claims & points made are well-supported; analysis focuses on both thematic & stylistic elements of the text; response includes appropriate balance of quotes & student analysis; student is clearly engaged with and moved by his/her thinking process
Accomplished
Response generally reflects a critical, analytical understanding of the text but is uneven; inferences demonstrate interpretive ability but could be developed further to better explain significance of detail; some claims may be vague, generalize OR lacking in support; analysis is loosely based on stylistic elements that suggest thematic meaning; some imbalance of quotes and student's analysis
Proficient
Response reflects a critical, analytical understanding of the text but is inconsistent in demonstration; inferences suggest interpretive ability but student fails to demonstrate understanding of the significance of detail; claims are vague, generalize OR lacking in support; analysis is loosely based on stylistic elements that suggest thematic meaning but is flawed; lacks quotes OR student's analysis is superficial.
Developing
Response reflects a solid understanding of the text but fails to connect to the text critically or analytically. Student simply response to prompt, providing a response that "answers" instead of explores.
Emerging
Response reflects a flawed understanding of the text AND does not provide any analysis to suggest basic familiarity to the text.
No Score
This code may be used for compositions that are entirely illegible or otherwise unscorable: blank responses, responses written in a foreign language, restatements of the prompt, responses that are off-topic or incoherent.
Organization of Ideas/Events
Distinguished
Organization is a logical progression of ideas/events and is unified and complete AND structure establishes relationship between/among ideas/events.
Accomplished
There is a logical progression of ideas/events and is reasonably complete, although minor lapses may be present AND structure establishes relationships between ideas/events, although minor lapses may be present.
Proficient
There is a logical progression of ideas/events and is reasonably complete, although minor lapses may be present AND structure establishes relationships between ideas/events, although minor lapses may be present BUT organization lacks the sophistication and/or consistency to indicate an "Accomplished" rating.
Developing
One or more major lapses in the logical progression of ideas/events is evident. Organizational structure establish some relationship between/among some of the ideas/events. The structure is minimally complete.
Emerging
Ideas/events are presented in a random fashion. Organizational structure does not establish connection between/among ideas/events. The overall structure is incomplete or confusing.
No Score
This code may be used for compositions that are entirely illegible or otherwise unscorable: blank responses, responses written in a foreign language, restatements of the prompt, responses that are off-topic or incoherent.
Support & Elaboration of Ideas
Distinguished
Support information is related to and supportive of the topic/subject. Elaboration consists of specific, developed details.
Accomplished
Support information has minor weaknesses in relatedness to and/or support of the topic/subject. Elaboration consists of some specific details.
Proficient
Support information has minor weaknesses in relatedness to and/or support of the topic/subject AND elaboration consists of some specific details BUT lacks the sophistication and/or consistency to indicate an "Accomplished" rating.
Developing
Support information has major weaknesses in relatedness to and/or support of the topic/subject. Elaboration consists of general and/or undeveloped details, which may be presented in a list-like fashion.
Emerging
An attempt has been made to add support information, but it was unrelated or confusing. Elaboration is sparse; almost no details.
No Score
This code may be used for compositions that are entirely illegible or otherwise unscorable: blank responses, responses written in a foreign language, restatements of the prompt, responses that are off-topic or incoherent.
Writing Technique
Distinguished
Exhibits skillful use of vocabulary that is precise and purposeful. Demonstrates skillful sentence fluency (varies length, good flow rhythm, and varied structure).
Accomplished
Exhibits reasonable use of vocabulary that is precise and purposeful AND demonstrates reasonable sentence fluency.
Proficient
Exhibits reasonable use of vocabulary that is precise and purposeful AND demonstrates reasonable sentence fluency BUT lacks the sophistication and/or consistency to indicate an "Accomplished" rating.
Developing
Exhibits minimal use of vocabulary that is precise and purposeful. Demonstrates minimal sentence fluency.
Emerging
Lacks use of vocabulary that is precise and purposeful. Sentence fluency is lacking.
No Score
This code may be used for compositions that are entirely illegible or otherwise unscorable: blank responses, responses written in a foreign language, restatements of the prompt, responses that are off-topic or incoherent.
Writing Conventions
Distinguished
Exhibits MASTERFUL CONTROL of grammatical conventions appropriate to the writing task: sentence formation; standard usage including agreement, tense, and case; and mechanics including use of capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Accomplished
Exhibits REASONABLE CONTROL of grammatical conventions appropriate to the writing task: sentence formation; standard usage including agreement, tense, and case; and mechanics including use of capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Proficient
Exhibits REASONABLE CONTROL of grammatical conventions appropriate to the writing task: sentence formation; standard usage including agreement, tense, and case; and mechanics including use of capitalization, punctuation, and spelling BUT lacks the sophistication and/or consistency to indicate an "Accomplished" rating.
Developing
Exhibits MINIMAL CONTROL of grammatical conventions appropriate to the writing task: sentence formation; standard usage including agreement, tense, and case; and mechanics including use of capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Emerging
LACKS CONTROL of grammatical conventions appropriate to the writing task: sentence formation; standard usage including agreement, tense, and case; and mechanics including use of capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
No Score
This code may be used for compositions that are entirely illegible or otherwise unscorable: blank responses, responses written in a foreign language, restatements of the prompt, responses that are off-topic or incoherent.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.