Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Informative Speech Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Informative Speech Rubric
Rubric Code:
K52769
By
jmaloneswfc
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criteria
N/A
0 pts
Poor
25 pts
Fair
50 pts
Good
75 pts
Excellent
100 pts
Introduction
20 %
Attention Getter
5 %
N/A
Poor
No attention-getter
is used.
Fair
Attention-getter is
present, but limited.
Good
Attention-getter gets audience involved
Excellent
Attention-getter grabs
the audience, creates
information hunger.
Thesis
5 %
N/A
Poor
Thesis is weak, overly general, bland.
Fair
An acceptable thesis is expressed in a complete sentence.
Good
A strong thesis that sets tone & direction for the speech is expressed in a complete sentence.
Excellent
A strong thesis that sets tone & direction for the speech is expressed in a complete sentence
Preview
5 %
N/A
Poor
Preview does not clearly state main points, or does not occur.
Fair
Preview alludes to 3-5 main points.
Good
Preview refers to 3-5 main points in one or more complete sentences.
Excellent
Preview clearly and comprehensively states the 3-5 main points.
Audience Interest
5 %
N/A
Poor
Interest in topic unclear or not mentioned; no audience adaptation or needs addressed.
Fair
The audience’s needs or interests are mentioned.
Good
Briefly states choice or interest in topic.
Excellent
Dramatic interest in topic is displayed, and the speech has obviously been adapted to the audience regarding their needs and interests. Your interest in the topic is clear, and audience adaptation is noted briefly in the introduction or conclusion.
Body
40 %
Main Points
8 %
N/A
Poor
Main points are confusing.
Fair
Main points are mentioned weakly or in a confusing order.
Good
Each main point is clearly stated.
Excellent
Each intriguing main point is clearly and strongly stated in a complete sentence.
Delivery/Speaking Notes
8 %
N/A
Incorrect form of speaking notes used.
Poor
No meaningful extemporaneous delivery due to significant reading of the speech.
10 notes cards or 1- 8.5x11 speaking note page.
Fair
Somewhat extemporaneous delivery. Regular use of notes and some reading.
10 notes cards or 1- 8.5x11 speaking note page.
Good
Good extemporaneous delivery using notes as a guide.
10 notes cards or 1- 8.5x11 speaking note page.
Excellent
Solid extemporaneous delivery, only subtly using notes for specific details
10 notes cards or 1- 8.5x11 speaking note page.
Subpoints
8 %
N/A
Poor
Little development of main points.
Fair
Development of each of the main points is spotty.
Good
Each main point is well-organized and developed with 2 subpoints (i.e., definitions, explanations, examples, analogies, statistics, etc.)
Excellent
Each main point is clearly organized and strongly developed with 3 or more subpoints (i.e.,definitions, explanations, examples, analogies, statistics, etc.)
Transitions
8 %
N/A
No transitions are used.
Poor
One Transition is used.
Fair
Transitions are bland and/or scarce.
Good
Transitions are used here and there to aid movement through the speech.
Excellent
Transitions are artfully used between each section and main point of the speech. At least one internal summary or preview is used.
Visual Aid
8 %
N/A
No visual aid(s) used.
Poor
Very little visual aid(s) were used.
Fair
Visual aid(s) were used.
Good
Visual aid(s) supplemented the presentation.
Excellent
Visual aid(s) were used effectively and appropriately, enhancing the speech.
Conclusion
20 %
Review
5 %
N/A
No real review.
Poor
Tried to review main points.
Fair
Review alludes to some of the main points.
Good
Review refers to the main points.
Excellent
Review clearly and comprehensively summarizes the main points.
Thesis Reinstated
5 %
N/A
The thesis is not restated.
Poor
Tried to reinstate thesis.
Fair
The thesis is more or less alluded to.
Good
The thesis is restated.
Excellent
The thesis is clearly restated with impact.
Sources
10 %
N/A
No sources mentioned.
Poor
One source is mentioned.
Fair
Some sources are mentioned.
Good
Sources are mentioned.
Excellent
Sources are cited; proper credit is given to authors.
Mechanics
10 %
Eye Contact
1.5 %
N/A
Poor
No significant eye contact is made.
Fair
Eye contact is attempted, but not with each member of the audience.
Good
Speaker has strong, direct eye contact during speech.
Excellent
Speaker has strong, direct eye contact with each member of the audience.
Language Choice
1.5 %
N/A
Poor
Language choice (manner) and appearance detracts from impression.
Fair
Language choice (manner) and appearance is correct but unexciting.
Good
Language choice (manner) and appearance increases interest.
Excellent
Language choice (manner) and appearance increases the speaker’s credibility and positively affects the attitude of the audience.
Gestures, Postures, Movement
1.5 %
N/A
Poor
Gestures, posture and movement consistently detract from the message.
Fair
Gestures, posture and movement occasionally detracts from the message.
Good
Gesture, posture and movement complement the message.
Excellent
Gestures, posture and movement complement and extend the message.
Volume, Rate, Pitch
1.5 %
N/A
Poor
Volume, rate and pitch consistently detract from the comprehensibility of the message.
Fair
Volume, rate and pitch sometimes distract from the comprehensibility of the message.
Good
Volume, rate and pitch allow speaker to be clearly understood.
Excellent
Volume, rate and pitch enhance the message. (projection, normal rate, and conversational pitch).
Vocal Varierty
1.5 %
N/A
Poor
Vocal variety is nonexistent.
Fair
Vocal variety is often monotone, losing audience interest.
Good
Vocal variety provides for an enjoyable speech.
Excellent
Vocal variety provides for an enjoyable speech. Keeps audience interested and involved.
Time
2.5 %
N/A
Poor
Significantly failed to meet the time limit. (Greater than 2 or more minutes over/ under.)
Fair
More than 1 minute over/under 7-10 minutes.
Good
Within 1 minute over or under 7-10 minutes. Appropriately met the time limit.
Excellent
Between 7-10 minutes. Effectively and appropriately met the time limit.
Outline
10 %
Full Sentence Outline
10 %
N/A
No outline submitted.
Poor
Fair
Outline submitted but not a full sentence.
Good
Excellent
Full sentence outline submitted.
Subjects:
Communication
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.