Skip to main content

iRubric: RMHS Showcase rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
RMHS Showcase 
Students will craft a video showcasing Rocky Mountain High School for Freshman Orientation.
Rubric Code: K3B82X
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric RMHS Showcase
  Poor

35 pts

Fair

60 pts

Good

80 pts

Very Good

90 pts

Excellent

100 pts

Script

Poor

Nothing was added to the video through narration or interviews. No storytelling was involved. No script or soundbites were turned in.
Fair

Some storytelling was added to the video but not enough to personalize it. Limited narration or interviews were used. An incomplete script was turned in with no soundbites.
Good

There is some storytelling through narration and/or interviews. Script is written out but no soundbites were attached.
Very Good

Very good storytelling through the use of narration and/or soundbites. A completed script was turned in with some soundbites attached.
Excellent

There is a beginning, middle, and end in the storytelling. The narrator and/or soundbites describe RMHS. A complete script with all of the soundbites written out is attached.
B-roll

Poor

Shots are not steady; zooms appear in the edited footage. Shots lack creativity and are framed poorly. Lighting distracts from the images.
Fair

There is little shot variety and several shots are shaky or handheld. Framing isn't always appropriate. Lighting is off in some images.
Good

Some attempts are made at different camera angles and shots. Most shots are steady and well framed. A tripod was used. Lighting is flat.
Very Good

There is a variety of camera shots and angles. One or two shots are shaky. A tripod, or flat surface, was used for every shot. Attention was paid to lighting and framing.
Excellent

A wide variety of shots and angles contribute to the story. All shots are steady and on a tripod; movement has a purpose. All shots are well lit and framed appropriately.
Audio

Poor

No microphone was used. Natural sound competes with voiceover/soundbites or is not present at all. Audio levels are poor and distracting; audio changes with every shot.
Fair

A microphone was used sometimes. Nat sound is either too loud or non-existent.
Audio levels are uneven and may "pop" in and out.
Good

The subject is mic'd. Natural sound exists but may be absent in some places. Sound is generally clear but levels are not even.
Very Good

The subjest is mic'd and audio is clear for the most part; audio levels are even. Natural sound remains at a constant level.
Excellent

The subject is mic'd and the audio is clear; Nat sound is not competing with other sound.Audio remains level throughout the entire video and enhances the story.
Editing

Poor

There are several gaps and jumpcuts distracting from the video. Little shot variety is used. Transitions are not well used and contain extra video; if they're used at all.
Fair

There are some jumpcuts, extra video in transitons and distracting edits. Shot variety is limited.
Good

The video is not seamless and there are some minor technical glitches. There are one or two jumpcuts in the piece and transitions have extra video in them.
Very Good

The story is almost seamless with a few minor distractions. Transitions are well used and add to the story.
Excellent

The piece is seamless. Shots flow and no video/audio jumpcuts are present. Transitions are well used and do not distract from the video.
Creativity

Poor

Video lacks a fresh approach or any true artistic vision. The presentation does not adhere to video standards.
Fair

Video demonstrates a familiar approach. One or two effects are used but they distract from the overall video and include extra frames.
Good

Video demonstrates a reasonably fresh approach. Only a few effects were attempted. Effects are not polished and distract from the end product.
Very Good

Video demonstrates a fresh approach and clear artistic vision in a presentation that exhibits originality, creativity and adherence to optimal video standards.
Excellent

Video is extremely creative with more than a dozen camera tricks and special effects added during editing. Effects add to the overall project.
Time

Poor

Production is less than 5:29 in length.
Fair

Production is 5:30-6:29 in length.
Good

Production is 6:30-7:04 minutes in length.
Very Good

Production is 7:05-7:44 in length.
Excellent

Production is 7:45-8 minutes in length.
Overall Video

Poor

Video neglects to tell a story that inspires students to make the most of their time at Rocky. Editing and visual storytelling need lots of work.
Fair

Video almost tells a story that might inspire students to make the most of their time at Rocky. Editing needs cleaned up and not all shots adhere to the Rule of Thirds. Audio needs some work as well.
Good

Video tells a story that inspires students to make the most of their time at Rocky with mostly clean editing and visual storytelling.
Very Good

Video tells a strong story that inspires students to make the most of their time at Rocky with solid visual storytelling and solid audio edits.
Excellent

Video tells a powerful story that inspires students to make the most of their time at Rocky with perfect visual storytelling and solid audio edits.
Teamwork

Poor

The group didn't work together to craft a successful video. There was little to no communication before, during, or after the production. One or more students were on their phone, playing video games or otherwise distracted during the production.
Fair

Some of the group worked together to craft a successful video. There is little communication before, during, or after the production. Several students were on their phone, playing video games or distracted during some of the production.
Good

Much of the group worked together to craft a successful video. There is limited communication before, during, or after the production. One or more students were on their phone, playing video games or distracted throughout the production.
Very Good

Most of the group worked together to craft a successful video. There is considerate communication before, during, and after the production. No one was on their phone, playing video games or distracted during the majority of the production.
Excellent

The whole group worked together to craft a successful video. There is open and constructive communication before, during, and after the production. No one was on their phone, playing video games or distracted during the entire production.
Individual Effort

Poor

This is an individual measurement for each team member's contributions before, during and after the production.

The team member didn't contribute at all.
Fair

This is an individual measurement for each team member's contributions before, during and after the production.
The team member contributed little and was often off task.
Good

This is an individual measurement for each team member's contributions before, during and after the production.
The team member made some effort to contribute through out the whole process.
Very Good

This is an individual measurement for each team member's contributions before, during and after the production.
The team member made good effort to contribute through out the whole process.
Excellent

This is an individual measurement for each team member's contributions before, during and after the production.
The team member made a strong effort to contribute through out the whole process.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202