Skip to main content

iRubric: AP French tele rouge rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
AP French tele rouge AP French Language and Culture Interpersonal Speaking Rubric Code: K2WCWA5 By sdhawan Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Hablar Interpersonal: Conversación
	Strong 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Weak 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Maintenance of Exchange	Strong Maintains the exchange with a series of responses that is clearly appropriate within the context of the task	Good Maintains the exchange with a series of responses that is generally appropriate within the context of the task	Fair Maintains the exchange with a series of responses that is somewhat appropriate within the context of the task	Weak Partially maintains the exchange with a series of responses that is minimally appropriate within the context of the task	Poor Unsuccessfully attempts to maintain the exchange by providing a series of responses that is inappropriate within the context of the task
Required Information	Strong Provides required information (e.g., responses to questions, statement, and support of opinion) with frequent elaboration	Good Provides required information (e.g., responses to questions, statement, and support of opinion) with some elaboration	Fair Provides required information (e.g., responses to questions, statement, and support of the opinion)	Weak Provides some required information (e.g., responses to questions, statement, and support of opinion)	Poor Unsuccessfully attempts to maintain the exchange by providing a series of responses that is inappropriate within the context of the task
Comprehensibility	Strong Fully understandable, with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not impede comprehensibility	Good Fully understandable, with some errors which do not impede comprehensibility	Fair Generally understandable, with errors that may impede comprehensibility	Weak Partially understandable, with errors that force interpretation and cause confusion for the listener	Poor Barely understandable, with frequent or significant errors that impede comprehensibility
Vocabulary and Idiomatic Language	Strong Varied and appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language	Good Varied and generally appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language	Fair Appropriate but basic vocabulary and idiomatic language	Weak Limited vocabulary and idiomatic language	Poor Very few vocabulary resources
Grammar, syntax, and usage	Strong Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax, and usage, with few errors	Good General control of grammar, syntax, and usage	Fair Some control of grammar, syntax, and usage	Weak Limited control of grammar, syntax, and usage	Poor Little or no control of grammar, syntax, and usage
Register	Strong Mostly consistent use of register appropriate for the conversation	Good Generally consistent use of register appropriate for the conversation, except for occasional shifts	Fair Use of register may be inappropriate for the conversation with several shifts	Weak Use of register is generally inappropriate for the conversation	Poor Minimal or no attention to register
Pronunciation, intonation, pacing	Strong Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility	Good Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response mostly comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility	Fair Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response generally comprehensible; errors occasionally impede comprehensibility	Weak Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend at times; errors impede comprehensibility	Poor Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend; errors impede comprehensibility
Clarification or Self-Correction	Strong Clarification or Self-Correction (if present) improves comprehensibility	Good Clarification or Self-Correction (if present) usually improves comprehensibility	Fair Clarification or Self-Correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility	Weak Clarification or Self-Correction (if present) usually does not improve comprehensibility	Poor Clarification or Self-Correction (if present) does not improve comprehensibility

Keywords:

AP, Interpersonal Speaking, Conversation

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Foreign Languages rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202