Skip to main content
iRubric: Hemingway's Heroes Peer Review rubric

iRubric: Hemingway's Heroes Peer Review rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Hemingway's Heroes Peer Review 
High school rubric for a paper analyzing the Hemingway Hero.
Rubric Code: K2C6X4
By jrfinley
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Hemingway's Heroes
Peer Review Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Focus/Organization

Is it on topic? Can you easily tell what the paper is about?
Poor

Does not state interpretation of the essay's purpose in the thesis statement; does not have a clear thesis statement.
Fair

Makes an attempt to state his or her interpretation of the essay's purpose, but the thesis is not clear.
Good

States an interpretation of the essay's purpose in a thesis statement; has a clear thesis.
Organization

Does it flow well? Is it logically organized?
Poor

The paper is very poorly organized and does not flow well.
Fair

An attempt at organization has been made, but some of the paper still does not flow logically.
Good

The paper is well organized and flow logically.
Grammar/Mechanics

Does this person use grammar properly?
Poor

There are numerous grammar errors.
Fair

There are a handful of errors, but not many.
Good

There are no more than 2-3 errors.
Spelling/Vocabulary

Are words spelled and used correctly?
Poor

There are numerous spelling errors, and many words are used incorrectly.
Fair

There are only a few spelling and usage errors.
Good

There are 3 or fewer spelling or usage errors.
Length & Format

Is it long enough?
Poor

Paper is not double-spaced, or is too short (should be at least 2 pages long).
Fair

Paper is double-spaced but not long enough.
Good

Paper is at least 2 pages long and double-spaced.
Conclusion

This should refer back to the main idea.
Poor

New material is introduced in the conclusion; the conclusion is abrupt, like the person reached the end of the 2nd page and quit without saying all they could about it.
Fair

Some new material may be introduced; the conclusion feels rushed, as though the person reached the end of the 2nd page and wanted to quit as soon as they could.
Good

No new material is introduced in the conclusion. The conclusion does not feel rushed, and the person did not stop as soon as the reached the end of the 2nd page.
Examples & Evidence

How are they proving their point?
Poor

Offers little or irrelevant evidence and few examples to support the qualities of a Hemingway hero.
Fair

Offers some evidence and some examples to support the qualities of a Hemingway hero; the evidence and examples may not always prove their point.
Good

Offers specific examples and evidence to support the qualities of a Hemingway hero that the character displays.
Use of Quotes

Quotes help support your evidence.
Poor

Uses no quotes to support evidence or examples.
Fair

Uses quotes to support evidence or examples, but the quotes are too long, too brief, or irrelevant.
Good

Uses several quotes throughout the paper to support evidence and examples; the quotes are relevant and of an appropriate length.
More Quotes

Are quotes introducted and discussed?
Poor

Quotes are not introduced or discussed; they are thrown at the reader as random fragments.
Fair

An attempt has been made to introduce or discuss the quote, but it is rough or leaves the quote hanging.
Good

Quotes are introduced and discussed; they are not left as hanging fragments.
Heroic Discussion

Comments on Hemingway's hero.
Poor

The discussion of the hero is shallow and vague; not a lot of thought has gone into it.
Fair

The discussion of the hero is rough but shows that the person is trying to analyze it; some points may be inaccurate.
Good

The discussion of the hero is in-depth and well-thought out. The discussion shows thoughtful analysis.
Heroic Qualities

Specifically points out 2-3 qualities of a Hemingway hero.
Poor

No discussion is made of how the character fits, or does not fit, the definition of a Hemingway hero.
Fair

A discussion of how the character fits or does not fit the definition of a Hemingway hero has been attempted.
Good

The writer successfully discusses how the character fits or does not fit the definition of a Hemingway hero.



Keywords:
  • Hemingway, Hero, High School, Secondary

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178