iRubric: Creative Writing rubric

The writer has not applied codes and conventions of the assigned task. It is evident that the writer has not fully collaborated with peers in order to produce this text. It is clear that the writer has not adapted his/her approach to journal writing. It is very clear that the writer has not self-evaluated their work prior to completing the assigned task.

The writer has partially applied the codes oand conventions of creative writing, but continues to struggle with appropriately collaborating with peers. The writer has slightly adapted his/her approach to journal writing. The writer has somewhat tried to self-assess his/her work but has failed to make any adjustments.

The writer has sufficiently applied the codes and copnventions of the assigned task however, there is room for improvement. The collaboration with peers prior to writing this assignment was somewhat well done and has allowed the student to meet the minimum standard. Improvement is definitely within reach. The writer has sufficiently achieved the basics of journal writing, and has used self-reflection as a means to improving. However, improvement in all areas is necessary.

The writer has applied the necessary codes and conventionsof the assigned task. It is evident that the writer has used collaboration with peers in a meaningful way. The writer understands who is the audience in journal writing and has successfully done so. It is clear that self-reflection was well used in order to improve the quality of the work presented.

The writer has exceeded the requirements and has adapted the codes and conventions in a unique way that brings the character alive. The writer understands the audience and has used this to better self-reflect on his/her process of journal writng in order to make it the best it can possibly be.