iRubric: Aiming and Accuracy rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Aiming and Accuracy A unit designed to engage students in activities related to aiming and accuracy: Kan Jam, Cornhole, Ladder Toss, Ring Toss Rubric Code: K24X2W8 By Neukay Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Physical Ed., Fitness Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Aiming & Accuracy
	Excellent 8 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 4 pts	Poor 2 pts	No work submitted 0 pts
Knowing & Understanding	Excellent How to play the game is clearly and specifically defined. Rules are comprehensive. Diagram of game play is clear and contains players, items used, and distance/space markers.	Fair How to play is defined. Rules are outlined, but not complete. Diagram of game play is mostly clear, containing players, items used, and/or distance/space markers.	Good How to play defined, but missing items. Rules outlined, not complete. Diagram moderately clear, with players, items used, and/or distance markers. Items may be missing.	Poor How to play is defined, but missing some items. Rules outlined, not complete. Diagram moderately clear, w/ players, items used, and/or distance markers. Some items missing.	No work submitted
Planning for Performance	Excellent 3 specific goals utilizing the SMART goal-setting strategy. Specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, time-bound.	Fair 3 goals utilizing the SMART goal-setting strategy. Specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, time-bound.	Good 2-3 goals utilizing most of the SMART goal-setting strategy. Specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, time-bound.	Poor 2 or fewer goals utilizing some of the SMART goal-setting strategy. Specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, time-bound.	No work submitted
Applying and Performing	Excellent Strong demonstration of skills specific to success in the selected game. Corrective behaviors clearly defined and used to improve game play.	Fair Demonstration of skills specific to success in the selected game. Corrective behaviors somewhat defined and used to improve game play.	Good Moderate demonstration of skills specific to success in the selected game. Corrective behaviors somewhat defined but not consistently used to improve game play.	Poor Non-consistent demonstration of skills specific to success in the selected game. Corrective behaviors vaguely defined and not consistently used to improve game play.	No work submitted
Reflecting and Improving	Excellent Clearly and specifically evaluated and analyzed game play. Strong evidence offered. 3 or more items written about.	Fair Evaluated and analyzed game play. Good amount of evidence offered. 2-3 items written about.	Good Evaluated and analyzed game play. Moderate amount of evidence offered. 2 items written about.	Poor Evaluated and/or analyzed game play. Little to no evidence offered. 1 or fewer items written about.	No work submitted