Skip to main content

iRubric: Discussion Board Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Discussion Board Rubric Discussion Board Rubric Rubric for online discussion board forums Rubric Code: K24B286 By rrdorsey Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Reflection Grade Levels: Undergraduate

ASL Literature Discussion Rubric This forum will explore how ASL literature challenges hearing-centered narratives that have silenced Deaf voices. The readings highlight how ASL literature is a powerful tool for expressing Deaf culture and identity. This rubric encourages critical engagement with ASL literature, promoting respectful discussion and helping students explore how ASL empowers Deaf communities by amplifying their stories and experiences.
	Exceeds Effort at this level is greater than expected 3 pts	Meets Expectations Effort at this level represents what is expected 2 pts	Poor Effort at this level is less than expected 1 pts	Insufficient No effort made at all in all components of the rubric. 0 pts
Comprehension and Engagement 3 pts Active engagement means students contribute to discussions, ask questions, and offer relevant insights, showing they’ve carefully read and reflected on the content. Students can clearly explain key themes, ideas, and concepts from the text.	Exceeds Demonstrates clear understanding of the reading. Provides thoughtful insights and references key moments or themes in the ASL literature.	Meets Expectations Shows a good understanding of the reading. Identifies key themes but lacks depth or full explanation of ideas.	Poor Lacks understanding of the reading. No clear reference to the ASL literature.	Insufficient No effort to engage with the readings..
Analysis and Interpretation 3 pts Students should analyze the deeper meanings and implications of the ASL literature, connecting it to broader cultural, historical, or social contexts.	Exceeds Offers detailed analysis of how the ASL literature reflects cultural, historical, or social contexts. Provides original interpretations and connections.	Meets Expectations Provides a solid analysis with some interpretation of cultural or social contexts, though could be more thorough.	Poor Offers a surface-level analysis, with limited interpretation or connection to broader contexts. Connections are vague and do not address both course materials and personal experiences.	Insufficient Lacks analysis or any meaningful interpretation of the reading.
Participation and Collaboration 3 pts Contribute to the discussion regularly, respond to peers' comments, and ask questions to further the conversation. Show respect for differing viewpoints and build on others’ ideas. Must reply to 2 colleagues to receive any credit	Exceeds Actively participates in discussions, listens to others, and contributes constructively. Engages with peers' ideas in a respectful and meaningful way. Personal opinion is appropriately expressed and clearly related to the original post. Thoughtful questions were posed to further discussion of the topic.	Meets Expectations Participates in discussions, but may not engage deeply with others’ ideas. Contributions are mostly on-topic. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opinion is appropriately expressed and posts as a whole show understanding. Questions were posed to further discussion of the topic.	Poor Simple replies that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the original post. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding. No questions were posed to further discussion of the topic.	Insufficient No participation in discussions.
Timeliness of Posts 3 pts Either 1 or 0 for completion of all posts on time.	Exceeds Original post is provided in timely manner for others to read, analyze and post response. All replies are made in a timely manner to promote deeper thinking and promote further dialogue.	Meets Expectations Original post is provided in timely manner for others to read, analyze and post response. All replies are made in a timely manner to promote deeper thinking and promote further dialogue.	Poor Original and all replies are not posted 24 hours prior to class meeting.	Insufficient No submission
Clarity and Organization 3 pts Ideas should be clearly presented, well-organized, and easy to follow. Responses should be concise and directly address the topic.	Exceeds Ideas are presented clearly and logically. Well-organized responses with clear connections between points.	Meets Expectations Ideas are generally clear, though some points may be less organized or developed.	Poor Ideas are not well-organized or clearly communicated. May be difficult to follow.	Insufficient None

Keywords:

discussion board forum rubric

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Education rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n7