Skip to main content
iRubric: Instructor Review: Process Paragraph rubric

iRubric: Instructor Review: Process Paragraph rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Instructor Review: Process Paragraph 
Rubric Code: K243W4
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Instructor Review
  Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Needs Improvement

(N/A)

Review Score

(N/A)

Date of Submission

Good

Submitted to the instructor on the assigned date.
Fair

One class day late.
Needs Improvement

Two class days late.
Review Score
MLA Format & Length

Good

The writer followed all MLA Format requirements and the length of the paragraph is at least 250 words (1 page) typed.
Fair

The writer followed most of the MLA Format requirements and the paragraph is at least 250 words (1 page) typed.
Needs Improvement

The writer did not meet most of the MLA Format requirements and the paragraph is less than 250 words (1 page) typed.
Review Score
Title

Does the title fit the story?

Good

Yes
Fair

Not entirely
Needs Improvement

No
Review Score
Topic Sentence

The topic sentence of the paragraph should give the reader a good idea of what will be covered.

Good

The topic sentence clearly and effectively states the topic and the focus of the paragraph.
Fair

The topic sentence does not effectively state the topic and/or the focus of the paragraph.
Needs Improvement

The topic sentence is not clear and/or it is not apparent one was included.
Review Score
Focus on Topic

(Content) Supporting sentences should relate to the topic sentence and give detail.

Good

There is one clear, well-focused topic. The main idea stands out and is sufficiently supported by at least 4 steps. The steps provide detailed information and examples to aid in the understanding of the process being discussed.
Fair

The main idea is somewhat clear. There are at least 4 steps, but the supporting information is general and/or needs more detailed supporting information and examples to aid in the understanding of the process being discussed.
Needs Improvement

The main idea is not clear, or there are very few details. There are less than 4 steps, and there is a seemingly random collection of information that does not aid in the understanding of the process being discussed.
Review Score
Sequencing

(Organization)

Good

Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.
Fair

Some details are not in a logical order or expected order, and this distracts the reader.
Needs Improvement

Many details are not in a logical order or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.
Review Score
Introductory & Closing Sentences

Good
Fair
Needs Improvement
Review Score
Description

Use of descriptive words (verbs, adjectives, adverbs, etc.)

Good

The writer is effective is their use of descriptive words. Their paragraph does a good job of painting a description in the reader's mind.
Fair

The writer uses some descriptive words. Their paragraph does an okay job of painting a picture in the reader's mind.
Needs Improvement

The writer did not use any descriptive words. Their paragraph does not paint a picture in the reader's mind.
Review Score
Capitalization

The paragraph and all proper nouns within it begin with a capital letter.

Good

All sentences within the paragraph begin with a capital letter and the paragraph has no other capitalization errors.
Fair

The paragraph has 1-2 errors in capitalization.
Needs Improvement

The paragraph does not begin with a capital letter and has more than 2 errors in capitalization.
Review Score
Punctuation

Does the paragraph contain the appropriate ending and other punctuation?

Good

The paragraph contains the correct ending punctuation.
Fair

The paragraph contains a few errors in punctuation.
Needs Improvement

The paragraph contains half or more errors in punctuation.
Review Score
Spelling

How many words are spelled correctly?

Good

All words in the paragraph are spelled correctly.
Fair

The paragraph contains 1-2 misspelled words.
Needs Improvement

The paragraph contains 3 or more misspelled words.
Review Score
Run-ons/CS & Sentence Fragments

(Commas errors/two independent sentences combined) (Not complete sentences)

Good

There are no run-ons, comma splices, or sentence fragments in the paragraph.
Fair

There are a few run-ons, comma splices, and/or sentence fragments in the paragraph.
Needs Improvement

There are many run-ons, comma splices, and/or sentence fragments in the paragraph.
Review Score
Mechanics

(Grammar & Word Choice)

Good

The writer demonstrates proper use of vocabulary that adds to the quality of writing and enhances the overall meaning of the topic.

Very few minor mechanical errors.
Fair

The writer occasionally demostrates proper word choices that add to the quality of writing and enhance the overall meaning of the topic.

Some minor mechanical errors.
Needs Improvement

The writer rarely demostrates proper word choices, causing the reader to become distracted from the topic.

Several major mechanical errors.
Review Score




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232