Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Oral Communication Debate Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Oral Communication Debate Rubric
Oral Communication Debate Rubric
Rubric Code:
K22A92
By
jkaise05
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Debate
No Evidence
2 pts
Limited
3 pts
Proficient
3.5 pts
Effective
4 pts
Exemplary
5 pts
Preparation
No Evidence
Weak/no preparation for the debate. Lack of notes and prepared comments for opening presentations.
Limited
Limited preparation for the debate. Notes and comments present for opening presentations; lack in organization and essential speech organizational elements.
Proficient
Sufficient preparation for the debate. Notes and comments are written or typed. Presentations have an introduction, body section with at least 1-2 points and closing marks.
Effective
Moderate to strong preparation for the debate. May be stronger in some sections than others. All presentations contain essential speech elements with 2 or more points.
Exemplary
Excellent preparation for the debate. typed speeches prepared in advance. Presentations complete with intro, body section w/3 or more points and closing comments.
Organization
No Evidence
Presentation is not at all organized. Information is not presented in a clear and understandable manner.
Limited
Presentation is somewhat organized. Information is presented in a manner that is somewhat clear and understandable.
Proficient
Presentation is mostly well organized. Information is presented in a mostly clear and understandable manner.
Effective
Majority of presentation is organized. All information and arguments make sense. Attempts to refute the opponent arguments.
Exemplary
Presentation is very well organized. Information is presented in a clear and understandable manner. Effective refutation of opponent arguments.
Analysis of Issues
No Evidence
Topic content is completely unorganized. No analysis of important issues. No details and examples presented for support. Weak knowledge of subject matter.
Limited
Topic content slightly unorganized. Analysis of issue present; few details and examples offered for support. Limited knowledge of subject matter.
Proficient
Topic content generally organized. Argument analysis uses details and examples to build support. Good knowledge of subject matter. More than two points presented.
Effective
Topic content clearly analyzed and several examples are presented that build the overall case. Strong working knowledge of the main arguments and points.
Exemplary
Topic content well organized. Clear analysis of the argument complete with details and examples. Excellent command of subject matter and several points.
Delivery Skills
No Evidence
Presenter does not make eye contact with the audience or speak clearly. Difficult to hear at times. Some words pronounced incorrectly.
Limited
Presenter makes limited eye contact with the audience and speaks somewhat clearly. More vocal expression and projection necessary.
Proficient
Presenter makes adequate eye contact with most of the audience and speaks clearly most of the time. Rate is understandable, words are pronounced correctly.
Effective
Presenter establishes confident eye contact the majority of the speech. Vocal expression and rate are adequate. Pleasant to listen to.
Exemplary
Presenter has strong eye contact with the entire audience and speaks clearly to convey the message. Words pronounced correctly. Vocal rate and expression appropriate.
Crossfire Q & A
No Evidence
No participation in crossfire or grand crossfire during the entire debate. Does not answer opponent's questions.
Limited
Limited particiapation during crossfire and grand crossfire sections of the debate. Unable to give logical answers and does not ask relevant questions.
Proficient
Moderate participation in the crossfire and grand crossfire. Does ask at least two questions and attempts to answer questions coherently. Maintains civility.
Effective
Effective participation in both crossfire and grand crossfire. Able to ask questions and answer confidently. Uses evidence to ask & answer questions. Keeps calm & does not get upset.
Exemplary
Outstanding participation in both crossfire and grand crossfire. Asks thoughtful and important questions. Answers questions comfortably. Civil throughout.
Keywords:
Debate
Subjects:
Communication
History
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.