Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Culinary Argumentative Essay rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Culinary Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
I can write an argument to support a claim with clear reasons and relevant evidence. This means I will introduce a claim and organize the reasons and evidence clearly, support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence, using credible sources, use words, phrases, and clauses to clarify the relationship among claim and reasons and provide a concluding statement that follows the argument presented
Rubric Code:
K229929
By
ChefMonts
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
Poor
10 pts
Fair
20 pts
Good
30 pts
Organization
Enter description
Poor
The response has little or no discernible organizational structure. The response may be related to the claim but may provide little or no focus:
• claim may be confusing or ambiguous; response may be too brief or the focus may drift from the purpose and/or audience
• few or no transitional strategies are evident
• introduction and/or conclusion may be missing
• alternate and opposing argument(s) may not be acknowledged *
Fair
The response has an inconsistent organizational structure:
• claim may be somewhat unclear, or the focus may be insufficiently sustained for the purpose and/or audience
• inconsistent use of transitional strategies and/or little variety
• introduction or conclusion, if present, may be weak
• alternate and opposing argument(s) may be confusing or not acknowledged *
Good
The response has an evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness.
• claim is clear, and the focus is mostly maintained for the purpose and audience
• adequate use of transitional strategies with some variety to clarify relationships between and among ideas
• adequate introduction and conclusion
• adequate progression of ideas from beginning to end; adequate connections between and among ideas
• alternate and opposing argument(s) are adequately ackn
Evidence
Enter description
Poor
The response provides minimal elaboration of the support/evidence for the claim and argument(s) that includes little or no use of source material.
• evidence (facts and details) from the source material is minimal, irrelevant, absent, incorrectly used, or predominantly copied
• insufficient use of citations or attribution to source material
• vocabulary is limited or ineffective for the audience and purpose
Fair
The response provides uneven, cursory elaboration of the support/evidence for the claim and argument(s) that includes some reasoned analysis and partial or uneven use of source material.
• some evidence (facts and details) from the source material may be weakly integrated, imprecise, repetitive, vague, and/or copied
• weak use of citations or attribution to source material
• vocabulary use is uneven or somewhat ineffective for the audience and purpose
Good
The response provides adequate elaboration of the support/evidence for the claim and argument(s) that includes reasoned analysis and the use of source material. The response adequately develops ideas, employing a mix of precise with more general language:
• adequate evidence (facts and details) from the source material is integrated and relevant, yet may be general
• adequate use of citations or attribution to source material
• vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audien
Conventions
Enter description
Poor
The response demonstrates little or no command of conventions:
• infrequent use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and spelling
Fair
The response demonstrates a partial command of conventions:
• limited use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and spelling
Good
The response demonstrates an adequate command of conventions:
• adequate use of correct sentence formation, punctuation, capitalization, grammar usage, and spelling
Subjects:
English
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.