Skip to main content

iRubric: Health Career Display - The Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Health Career Display - The Presentation 
You will give a 5 minute speech related to the career of your choosing.
Rubric Code: K228C85
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Presentation Content
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

15 pts

Good

12 pts

Average

9 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

0 pts

Understanding of the Career

Enter description

Excellent

The presenters
shared exceptional
insight and depth of
knowledge on the
career or career
cluste
Good

The presenters
shared knowledge
and understanding
of the career or
career cluster.
Average

The presenters
demonstrated some
command of the
knowledge of the
career/ career
cluster.
Fair

The presenters
shared knowledge of
the career/ career
cluster but failed to
effectively teach the
judges.
Poor

The presenters
shared little to no
knowledge of the
career/ career
cluster. The judges
were left with more
questions than
answers
Why This Career?

Why This Career?

Excellent

Compelling
examples of the
significance of the
presenter’s choice of
career field.
Relevant, engaging
stories were shared
that brought the
presentation to life
Good

The team/individual shared
engaging examples
of why they
selected their
career field. Stories
were shared to add
a personal touch to
the career
selection.
Average

The team/individual told the
story for why they
chose their career
field but were unable
to provide relevant
examples to bring
the story to life.
Fair

The team/ individual attempted
to tell a story of the
significance of
choosing their career
field, but the story
was irrelevant to the
career field.
Poor

The team/imdividual was
unable to connect a
story for why they
chose their career
field of interest.
Presentation of Career Information

Enter description

Excellent

The presentation of
the career
information was
exceptionally
organized, clear,
and included
relevant details to
highlight the career/
career cluster.
Good

The content and
messaging of the
career information
were presented in a
clear and concise
manner.
Average

Information shared
by presenters was
mostly organized
and included few
details of the career/
career cluster.
Fair

Presenters shared
little knowledge of
the career field, and
the information
shared was not
delivered in a clear
and concise manner.
Poor

Little to no
information was
presented to the
judges on the
career information.
Presentation Content
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Average

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

0 pts

Display Incorporated into Presentation

Excellent

The display
enhanced the
messaging of the
career/ career
cluster and helped
bring the
presentation to life
Good

The display helped
tell the story of the
career/ career
cluster. It
complemented the
presentation
effectively.
Average

The team did an
adequate job of
using the display to
support the
presentation
Fair

The display
somewhat enhanced
the presentation on
the career/ career
cluster yet seemed
to miss key points of
emphasis
Poor

The display
seemed to be an
“afterthought” to the
presentation.
There was a
disconnect between
what was featured
on the display and
the presentation.
How the Career Fits into the Healthcare System

Excellent

The team/individual effectively
presented the
relevance of how the
career aligns to the
healthcare system
and the outlook for
the career.
Good

The team/individual
moderately
highlighted the
significance of how
the career fits into
the healthcare
system
Average

The team/individual shared
how the career fits
into the healthcare
system but did not
provide significant
detail.
Fair

The team/individual briefly
mentioned how the
career fits into the
healthcare system.
Poor

The team/individual did not
share how the
career fits into the
healthcare system
Presentation Delivery
Voice

Pitch, tempo,
volume, quality
  Excellent

15 pts

Good

12 pts

Average

9 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

0 pts

Voice

Pitch, tempo,
volume, quality

Excellent

Each presenters
voice was loud
enough to hear. The
competitors varied
rate & volume to
enhance the
speech. Appropriate
pausing was
employed.
Good

Each presenters
spoke loudly and
clearly enough to
be understood. The
competitors varied
rate OR volume to
enhance the
speech. Pauses
were attempted.
Average

Each presenters
could be heard most
of the time. The
competitors
attempted to use
some variety in vocal
quality, but not
always successfully
Fair

Most of the
presenters voices
were low. Judges
have difficulty
hearing the
presentation
Poor

Instructor had difficulty
hearing and/or
understanding
much of the speech
due to low volume.
Little variety in rate
or volume
Presentation Delivery
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Average

6 pts

Fair

4 pts

Poor

0 pts

Stage Presence

Poise, posture,
eye contact, and
enthusiasm

Excellent

Movements &
gestures were
purposeful and
enhanced the
delivery of the
speech and did not
distract. Body
language reflects
comfort interacting
with audience.
Facial expressions
and body language
consistently
generated a strong
interest and
enthusiasm for the
topic
Good

The presenters
maintained
adequate posture
and non-distracting
movement during
the speech. Some
gestures were
used. Facial
expressions and
body language
sometimes
generated an
interest and
enthusiasm for the
topic.
Average

Stiff or unnatural use
of nonverbal
behaviors. Body
language reflects
some discomfort
interacting with
audience. Limited
use of gestures to
reinforce verbal
message. Facial
expressions and
body language are
used to try to
generate enthusiasm
but seem somewhat
forced.
Fair

Most of the
preesnters posture,
body language, and
facial expressions
indicated a lack of
enthusiasm for the
topic. Movements
were distracting.
Poor

No attempt was
made to use body
movement or
gestures to
enhance the
message. No
interest or
enthusiasm for the
topic came through
in presentation
Diction*, Pronunciation** and Gramm

Excellent

Delivery emphasizes
and enhances
message. Clear
enunciation and
pronunciation. No
vocal fillers (ex:
"ahs," "uh/ums," or
"you-knows”). Tone
heightened interest
and complemented
the verbal message.
Good

Delivery helps to
enhance message.
Clear enunciation
and pronunciation.
Minimal vocal fillers
(ex: "ahs,"
"uh/ums," or "youknows”). Tone
complemented the
verbal message.
Average

Delivery adequate.
Enunciation and
pronunciation
suitable. Noticeable
verbal fillers (ex:
"ahs," "uh/ums," or
"you-knows”)
present. Tone
seemed inconsistent
at times
Fair

Delivery quality
minimal. Regular
verbal fillers (ex:
"ahs," "uh/ums," or
"you-knows”)
present. Delivery
problems cause
disruption to
message.
Poor

Many distracting
errors in
pronunciation
and/or articulation.
Monotone or
inappropriate
variation of vocal
characteristics.
Inconsistent with
verbal messag




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202