Skip to main content
iRubric: WWII Virtual Museum Rubric

iRubric: WWII Virtual Museum Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
WWII Virtual Museum Rubric 
WWII Virtual Museum Rubric
Virtual Museum of the the National Living Treasure Awardees
Rubric Code: K226C6X
By jmcatz
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Grading Rubric
  Excellent 10-9

(N/A)

Good 8-7

(N/A)

Fair 6-5

(N/A)

Poor 4-3

(N/A)

Museum Rooms

Excellent 10-9

-At least 2 required rooms
-Design looks professional
-Layout is appropriate for the topic
-Images and videos are placed intentionally and meaningfully; there is a flow to their order
-Context and scope are clearly connected. All required components are present and thoughtfully done.
Good 8-7

-2 required rooms
-Design looks almost professional
-Layout is appropriate for topic but can have more details.
-Images and videos appear to be organized; there appears to be a flow in the order of images
-Context and scope are somewhat connected. Most required components are present but may be poorly done.
Fair 6-5

-1 room
-Design is minimal
-Layout could use more attention to details
-Images and videos are random; there does not appear to be an flow to the order
-Context and scope are not clearly connected to research question; few components are present and may be poorly done.
Poor 4-3

-1 room
-Poorly designed
-No attention to detail
-Images and videos are random and the order causes confusion
-Context and scope are not clearly connected to research question; few components are present and may be poorly done
Artifacts

Excellent 10-9

-10-15 meaningful images that span the breadth of the topic
-1-2 powerful videos that (max ~20 min. total)
-images and video tell a seamless story that demonstrates thorough understanding and significance of the topic
-Wide diversity in type and connection of artifacts demonstrates a wealth of research and support; explanations of artifacts are clear and provide unique and specific support to the exhibit’s focus and POV.
Good 8-7

-10-15 images that are about the topic but may not span the breadth of the topic
-1-2 videos about the topic but may not be powerful
-images and video demonstrates good understanding of the topic

-Somewhat diverse types and/or connections of artifacts provide support; explanations of artifacts are mostly clear and provide specific support to the exhibit’s focus and POV
Fair 6-5

-10-15 images but some may not relate to the topic or they may just focus on one minor aspect of the topic
-includes 1-2 videos but are not related to the topic
-images and video demonstrate some understanding of the topic and some confusion
-Topic is addressed but not discussed or elaborated on.
-Minimal diversity in types and/or connections of artifacts provide support; explanations of artifacts are may be unclear and/or lacks support to the exhibit’s focus and POV
Poor 4-3

-less than 10 images
-no video
-the majority of images and videos are unrelated to the topic
-images and video demonstrate little understanding of the topic or much confusion
Descriptions

Excellent 10-9

-Descriptions are well thought out and meaningfully supports the exhibit.
-No grammatical errors. -Information is at the advanced level; it goes above and beyond common knowledge to demonstrate thorough understanding of the topic
-Strong paragraph structure
-Descriptions are included for every image and video.
Good 8-7

-Descriptions are thought out and enhance the exhibit
-No major grammatical errors.
-Information adequately supports images.
-Good paragraph structure
-Descriptions are included for most images and videos.
Fair 6-5

-Description is simple but accurate.
- Some grammatical errors. -Information supports images at times.
-Weak paragraph structure
-Descriptions are missing from some images and videos.
Poor 4-3

-Description is oversimplified and has several inaccuracies
-There are several grammatical errors
-The information does not consistently support images.
-Not in complete paragraphs
-Most images and videos do not have descriptions
Citations

Excellent 10-9

-All images and videos are properly cited in the "copyrights" section
-In-text citations are proper MLA formatting
-Quotations, statistics, and research are properly introduced and cited
Good 8-7

-The majority of images and videos are properly cited in the "copyrights" section
-In-text citations are mostly in proper MLA formatting
-Quotations, statistics, and research are mostly properly introduced and cited
Fair 6-5

-Some images and videos are properly cited in the "copyrights" section
-Missing some in-text citations and/or did not include proper MLA formatting
-Quotations, statistics, and research are somewhat properly introduced and cited
Poor 4-3

-Most images and videos are NOT properly cited in the "copyrights" section
-Most in-text citations are NOT in proper MLA formatting
-Most quotations, statistics, and research are NOT properly introduced and cited
Group Work

Excellent 10-9

-Used class time effectively and both partners were on task the entire time.
-Communicated clearly with one another and worked out issues or problems together
-Both contributed equally to each stage of the project.
Good 8-7

-Mostly used class time effectively and both partners were on task the majority of the time.
-Communicated respectfully with one another and tried to work out issues or problems together
-Each partner contributed almost equally to each stage of the project.
Fair 6-5

-Used class time effectively some of the time but either both/one was off task some of the time.
-Communication was not very clear with one another and still had issues that were unresolved.
-There was unequal share of several stages of the project.
Poor 4-3

-Did not class time effectively; both or one was off task the majority of the time.
-Were distracting to other groups
-Communication was disrespectful and/or ideas were not clearly relayed or accepted.
-Issues were not worked out together
-Unequal share of the majority of the project.
Aesthetics

Excellent 10-9

Layout is exemplary,creative and compelling.

Effective use of color and font.
Good 8-7

Layout is clear, and aesthetically appealing.

Effective use of color and font.
Fair 6-5

Exhibit is confusing.

Layout is unclear and or incomplete.
Poor 4-3

Layout is unclear and or incomplete.



Keywords:
  • Virtual Museum Rubric


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60