Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Project Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Project Rubric
The project rubric is for assessing the quality of the project presentation.
Rubric Code:
JXX857
By
coreysmith
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Project Presentation
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Question, Language Use
Needs Improvement
No clearly-defined question. Presentation rambles Lack of coherent arguments Lack of goal Team Member ideas not integrated
Fair
Research question is vague Organization elements are present, but weak logical flow Arguments are not clear Goal is not clear Team member ideas not well-integrated.
Good
Research question is fairly clear and concise, but could use a little tweaking Presentation outline is clearly evident Main point is clear Goals are articulated Group effort is seamless
Excellent
Question is stated directly and clearly explained. Organized-clear beginning, middle and end with logical thought progressing and elements are relevant and well-integrated. Persuasive arguments and examples Goal is clear and well integrated Collaboration of group effort is seamless.
Completeness, Teamwork
Needs Improvement
One team member doing all the work Excessive adult intervention (help from mentor/coach) and/or unable to answer judges' questions No supporting data Elements of assignment missing Did not reach out to science professionals or share ideas with others No clear arguments
Fair
Less than 1/2 team doing work Adult intervention is apparent and/or 1/2 team able to answer judges's questions Insufficient and/or misinterpreted data Most aspects of assignment carried out Attempted to reach out to science professionals Arguments obscured by jargon
Good
3/4 team doing the work 3/4 able to answer judges's questions Evidence is presented All aspects of assignment fully carried out Spoke to science professionals or shared ideas with other Good use of technical terms
Excellent
All team members participating This project is clearly the work of the children and all students able to answer judges' questions Evidence is clearly supported Original supporting data carefully documented in all aspects of assignment Spoke to science professionals and shared ideas with others Team provides judges with a full understanding of technical terms
Background, Data & Graphics
Needs Improvement
No outside sources (books, websites, magazines, etc) used No mention of sources No visual aids Supported printed materials not provided
Fair
Very limited outside sources/only one source or type of source cited Credit to sources not given Ineffective use of visual aids Supporting printed materials provided to judge(s)
Good
Several good sources Credit is given to others when due Visual aids support research question Supporting printed materials provided to judge(s) and referenced
Excellent
Wide variety of sources cited Credit given clearly when due Carefully chosen visual aids clearly support research question Relevant supporting printed material given to judge(s) and incorporated during presentation.
Analysis & Conclusions
Needs Improvement
Presentation has no link to research question No relevance to FLL theme Alternate views ignored Lacking personal reflection Analysis not relatable to research question Lacks stance on findings.
Fair
Link to research question is vague Relevance is unclear Alternate views dismissed Conclusions are vague and unsupported Analysis has little relation to research question Insights and findings not shared
Good
Link to research question is clear Relevance to FLL theme is implied Awareness of differing views and implications considered Conclusions are inferred Analysis ties to research question Students take firm, articulate stand
Excellent
Presentation thoroughly links to research questions Relevance to FLL theme is clearly stated Alternative views considered with well-supported position on issues Conclusions are clearly supported by data Analysis clearly relates well to research question Original, important insights are shared
Style
Needs Improvement
Many errors Too long/short Not rehearsed Plagued with technical difficulties No thought put into presentation format Lacks excitement
Fair
Few errors Slightly to long/short Semi-rehearsed Several technical difficulties Presentation seems rused or unrefined Information presented with limited flair
Good
Very few evident errors Proper length Well-rehearsed Very minor tech difficulties Well-edited Students are having fun with delivery
Excellent
Presentation is seamless Team prepared and on-time Very well rehearsed-model of clarity & good speaking No technical difficulties Very well polished and easy to follow A joy for the audience-humor, personal touches, and clever presentation style
Keywords:
Project Presentation
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.