Skip to main content
iRubric: Project Rubric

iRubric: Project Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Project Rubric 
The project rubric is for assessing the quality of the project presentation.
Rubric Code: JXX857
By coreysmith
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Project Presentation
  Needs Improvement

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Question, Language Use

Needs Improvement

No clearly-defined question. Presentation rambles Lack of coherent arguments Lack of goal Team Member ideas not integrated
Fair

Research question is vague Organization elements are present, but weak logical flow Arguments are not clear Goal is not clear Team member ideas not well-integrated.
Good

Research question is fairly clear and concise, but could use a little tweaking Presentation outline is clearly evident Main point is clear Goals are articulated Group effort is seamless
Excellent

Question is stated directly and clearly explained. Organized-clear beginning, middle and end with logical thought progressing and elements are relevant and well-integrated. Persuasive arguments and examples Goal is clear and well integrated Collaboration of group effort is seamless.
Completeness, Teamwork

Needs Improvement

One team member doing all the work Excessive adult intervention (help from mentor/coach) and/or unable to answer judges' questions No supporting data Elements of assignment missing Did not reach out to science professionals or share ideas with others No clear arguments
Fair

Less than 1/2 team doing work Adult intervention is apparent and/or 1/2 team able to answer judges's questions Insufficient and/or misinterpreted data Most aspects of assignment carried out Attempted to reach out to science professionals Arguments obscured by jargon
Good

3/4 team doing the work 3/4 able to answer judges's questions Evidence is presented All aspects of assignment fully carried out Spoke to science professionals or shared ideas with other Good use of technical terms
Excellent

All team members participating This project is clearly the work of the children and all students able to answer judges' questions Evidence is clearly supported Original supporting data carefully documented in all aspects of assignment Spoke to science professionals and shared ideas with others Team provides judges with a full understanding of technical terms
Background, Data & Graphics

Needs Improvement

No outside sources (books, websites, magazines, etc) used No mention of sources No visual aids Supported printed materials not provided
Fair

Very limited outside sources/only one source or type of source cited Credit to sources not given Ineffective use of visual aids Supporting printed materials provided to judge(s)
Good

Several good sources Credit is given to others when due Visual aids support research question Supporting printed materials provided to judge(s) and referenced
Excellent

Wide variety of sources cited Credit given clearly when due Carefully chosen visual aids clearly support research question Relevant supporting printed material given to judge(s) and incorporated during presentation.
Analysis & Conclusions

Needs Improvement

Presentation has no link to research question No relevance to FLL theme Alternate views ignored Lacking personal reflection Analysis not relatable to research question Lacks stance on findings.
Fair

Link to research question is vague Relevance is unclear Alternate views dismissed Conclusions are vague and unsupported Analysis has little relation to research question Insights and findings not shared
Good

Link to research question is clear Relevance to FLL theme is implied Awareness of differing views and implications considered Conclusions are inferred Analysis ties to research question Students take firm, articulate stand
Excellent

Presentation thoroughly links to research questions Relevance to FLL theme is clearly stated Alternative views considered with well-supported position on issues Conclusions are clearly supported by data Analysis clearly relates well to research question Original, important insights are shared
Style

Needs Improvement

Many errors Too long/short Not rehearsed Plagued with technical difficulties No thought put into presentation format Lacks excitement
Fair

Few errors Slightly to long/short Semi-rehearsed Several technical difficulties Presentation seems rused or unrefined Information presented with limited flair
Good

Very few evident errors Proper length Well-rehearsed Very minor tech difficulties Well-edited Students are having fun with delivery
Excellent

Presentation is seamless Team prepared and on-time Very well rehearsed-model of clarity & good speaking No technical difficulties Very well polished and easy to follow A joy for the audience-humor, personal touches, and clever presentation style



Keywords:
  • Project Presentation

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232