iRubric: Short Response Critera rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Short Response Critera Short Response Critera 10 Point rubric detailing the criteria for a successful short written response. Rubric Code: JXCXXB8 By pferrari Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Philosophy Type: Homework Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Short Written Response WOK rubric for short written response pieces.
	Poor Little effort was put into this assignment. 2 pts	Fair It's adequate work but not superior. 5 pts	Good Ask: Would you keep reading this piece if it were longer? 10 pts
Ideas The main message of the piece, theme, with supporting details that enrich and develop that theme.	Poor The topic is unclear. Ideas are vague and not well supported. Offers no insight from student. Makes no personal connection to WOK.	Fair The topic is straight forward and manageable. Details are effectively supported by personal connections to WOK, though some may be vague.	Good This paper is clear and focused. Relevant details enrich the central idea. The student show insight about the topic and makes strong and creative connections to WOK.
Organization The thread of ideas. The sequence of ideas.	Poor This paper has no clear sense of purpose or central idea. No introduction or conclusion.<BR> The idea is a simple restatement or a simple answer to the WOK question.	Fair The paper has a recognizable introduction and conclusion.<BR> Organizational structure sometimes supports the main point of the WOK idea.	Good The organizational structure of this paper enhances the central idea of the paper;includes a catchy introduction and a satisfying conclusion. Organization is appropriate for for purpose. Risks were effectively taken.
Voice The unique perspective of the writer in the piece through the use of compelling idea, engaging language, and revealing details	Poor The writer fails to connect with audience. Purpose is unclear. Writing is risk free with no sense of the writer.	Fair The writing is sincere but not engaged. Pleasant but not compelling. Reveals personal connections to WOK but avoids risks.	Good The writer takes risks with revealing details about their ideas about the WOK topic. Writing reflects understanding and commitment to topic. Strong connections to WOK. Personal, honest and engaging.
Presentation MLA style unless other wise specified.	Poor Errors in language that impact understanding of reader. Not professional;lacks academic integrity.	Fair Good attempt at proper use of English language including spelling and grammar. Some errors but none that impact readability. Neat and professional.	Good Strong attempt at proper use of English language, including spelling and grammar. Few errors. Neat and professional.