Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: 日本語300 天気予報 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
日本語300 天気予報
日本語200 天気予報
This rubric is designed for a Japanese 300 pair/team project. The students are to produce a digital creation of weather forecast. They are to act, record, and edit for a final product. The students are being graded both individually and as a pair/team.
Rubric Code:
JXB4585
By
teruyosensei
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Performance Rubric
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Pronunciation
Poor
Student pronounced 7 or more words incorrectly, with little effort for correction.
Fair
Student pronounced 5-6 words incorrectly, with some effort for correction.
Good
Student pronounced 3-4 words incorrectly, with some effort for correction.
Excellent
Student pronounced 0-2 words incorrectly, with great effort for correction.
Fluency
Poor
Student presented a below average demonstration of japanese fluency. Student stumbled over words and missed or confused lines multiple times. Student had to use note-cards for lines.
Fair
Student presented an average demonstration of Japanese fluency. Student stumbled over words and missed or confused lines more than 3 times. Student had to use note-cards for lines often.
Good
Student presented an average demonstration of Japanese fluency. Student stumbled over words at times and confused lines two or less times. Student had to use note cards for lines often.
Excellent
Student presented an average to above average performance. Student had few to no issues with fluency.
Props
Poor
Students used 0-1 props in their skit and/or props did not contribute to the performance.
Fair
Students used 2 props and most contributed to the understanding of the performance.
Good
Students used 3-4 props and most contributed to the understanding of the performance.
Excellent
Students used 5 or more props and all contributed to the performance making the skit very entertaining.
Effort and Attitude
Poor
The student put little to no effort into the skit and the group grade suffered because of attitude.
Fair
The student could have done more to contribute and/or was not showing enthusiasm.
Good
The student could have done more to contribute and/or, however was showing enthusiasm.
Excellent
The student was excited and ready to present. The group benefited from this member.
Creativity
Poor
The students presented little creativity in their skit.Students worked together poorly, skit was late, preparation was unorganized, and/or took away from the overall quality of the work
Fair
The student's presentation was a little creative, room for improvement.<BR>
Students worked together , skit was on time, preparation was unorganized, and/or took away from the overall quality of the work
Good
The student's presentation was creative and unique, however had room for improvement.<BR>
Students worked together with little or no problems, skit was on time, and/or organization was lacking but acceptable.
Excellent
The student's work was very creative and unique!
Participation/peer evaluation
Poor
Did not work well within his/her pair, and did not bring ideas to his/her pair.
Fair
Not both of the pair equally participated according to the task.
Good
Both of the pair fully participated, however, there's room for improvement.
Excellent
Both of the pair fully participated and brought ideas to their group.
Quality of the recording
Poor
The scenes were recorded with irrelevant background, not used tripod, zooming in and out.
Fair
The scenes were recorded with not-so-appropriate background, used tripod, zooming in and out.
Good
The scenes were recorded with appropriate background, but not used tripod, zooming in and out.
Excellent
The scenes were recorded with appropriate background, used tripod, zooming in and out.
Quality of editing
Poor
The final product was either not edited nor had any audio/visual addition.
Fair
The final product was edited but there was a lot of room to improve the transition smoothly..
Good
The final product was edited into a transition with some room for improvement. appropriate audio/visuals.
Excellent
The final product was edited into a smooth transition with appropriate audio/visuals.
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.