Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Novel Study Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Novel Study Project
Novel Study Project
Students will choose and construct a creative representation of their novel from the choices provided.
Rubric Code:
JX76X8B
By
smoorhouse
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Novel Project
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Satisfactory
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Poor
(N/A)
Comprehension
Excellent
Project displays an extensive understanding of the characters, plot, and theme in the novel. Student utilized elements from the novel to skillfully go beyond the novel itself, adding their own interpretation of events, characters, theme, etc.
Good
Project displays a clear understanding of the characters, plot, and theme in the novel. Student utilized elements from the novel to sufficiently go beyond the novel itself, adding their own interpretation of events, characters, theme, etc.
Satisfactory
Project displays a sound understanding of the characters, plot, and theme in the novel, but this understanding may be lacking in depth and/or complexity. Student utilized some elements from the novel to go somewhat beyond the novel itself.
Fair
Project displays a basic understanding of the characters, plot, and theme in the novel. Student did not utilize sufficient elements from the novel to go beyond the novel itself, and/or did not add their own interpretation of events, characters, theme, etc.
Poor
Project does not display an understanding of the characters, plot, and theme in the novel. Student did not extend ideas beyond the literal ideas of the text.
Relevance of Content
Excellent
Project displays content and details that are truly relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This student thoughtfully engaged with the details of his or her content.
Good
Project displays content and details that are mostly relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This student engaged with the details of his or her content.
Satisfactory
Project displays content and details that are somewhat relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This student should have more thoughtfully engaged with the details of his or her content.
Fair
Project displays content and details that are limited and not very relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This student did not thoughtfully engage with the details of his or her content.
Poor
Project does not display content and details that are relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This student did not thoughtfully engage with the details of his or her content.
Organization
Excellent
This project is well organized from beginning to end.
Good
This project is generally well organized.
Satisfactory
This project has a few errors in organizaitonal format that become distracting to the reader.
Fair
This project has limited organization, therefore, reader understanding is impaired.
Poor
This project is poorly organized.
Creativity
Excellent
Project has extremely creative and original ideas. Truly showed the student's creative talents. The project had a strong 'voice' and that voice was distinctive to the author.
Good
Project has several creative and original ideas. Most aspects of the project demonstrated some level of creativity and a satisfactory and unique voice.
Satisfactory
Project has some creative and original ideas. Some aspects of the project demonstrated some level of creativity and a satisfactory and unique voice.
Fair
Project has minimal creativity and original ideas. Most components were a literarl interpretation of the text. The student's unique voice was lacking.
Poor
Project has little to no creative and original ideas.
Accuracy
Excellent
Student provided accurate and detailed explanations where explanations were required. In projects where characters, events, and timelines needed to ring true, the student hit the mark.
Good
Student provided accurate and somewhat detailed explanations where explanations were required. In projects where characters, events, and timelines needed to ring true, the student mostly hit the mark.
Satisfactory
Student provided explanations where explanations were required, although they were not as detailed or accurate as desired. In projects where events, timelines and characters needed to ring true, the student missed the mark .
Fair
Student provided simple explanations where explanations were required. In projects where events, timelines and characters needed to ring true, the student missed their target frequently.
Poor
Student provided few explanations where they were required. In projects where events, timelines and characters needed to ring true, the student missed the mark.
Effort
Excellent
Demonstrates clear and insightful understanding of the connection to the novel and work as a whole. Effort is obvious!
Good
Shows time and thought went into the preparation and execution of the project.
Satisfactory
Shows evidence of time, thought and preparation; however, the final result may have been somewhat simplistic in nature.
Fair
Shows little evidence of time in the project. Minimum amount of effort in project.
Poor
Virtually no time or effort in the project. Looks like a last ditch effort to turn something in.
Proofreading/Editing
Excellent
It is clear that the student spent time in quality proofreading and editing as the final project is virtually error free.
Good
There was definately effort put into proofreading and editing, however, a few errors are popping up.
Satisfactory
The student needs to spend more time in quality proofreading and editing as the final project has a few too many errors.
Fair
Comprehension and enjoyment of the project is becoming impaired as the errors and interfering with the reader/viewer interacting with the work effectively.
Poor
Clearly, the student did not spend adequate time in proof-reading and editing. This work should not have been handed in as a good copy yet.
Keywords:
English, Novel, Project, Presentation
Subjects:
English
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.