Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Capstone - Technical Report rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Capstone - Technical Report
You are required to write a Technical Report in English of 8 pages minimum in Arial 11 points, spacing 1.5 maximum.
Rubric Code:
JX6226X
By
dbelanger
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Project Proposal
10 %
Students will submit a 1 page summary of the intent of the
project including the research question and the anticipated
project objectives.
Excellent
7 pts
Good
5 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
1 pts
Research Purpose
8 %
Enter description
Excellent
The project proposal clearly defines the research question or the practical investigation, along with the project scope and sets the scene for the report to follow.
Proposal aligns with Power Engineering principles.
Good
The project proposal defines the research question or the practical investigation, along with the project scope and sets the scene for the report to follow.
Proposal aligns with Power Engineering principles.
Fair
The project proposal somewhat defines the research question or the practical investigation, along with the project scope and somewhat sets the scene for the report to follow.
Proposal mostly aligns with Power Engineering principles.
Poor
The project proposal does not clearly define the research question or the practical investigation, along with the project scope and does not set the scene for the report to follow.
Proposal does not align with Power Engineering principles.
Sentence Structure
2 %
Enter description
Excellent
Consistently clear & proper use of language. No spelling or grammar mistakes.
Good
A few errors that do not impair meaning or clarity much. 1-2 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Fair
Many errors that affect writing clarity or meaning. 3-5 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Poor
Consistently poor and unclear use of language; errors impair meaning. More than 5 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Capstone - Technical Report
90 %
Excellent
7 pts
Good
5 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
1 pts
Organization & Readability
10 %
Excellent
Overall organization clear & develops very logically; easy to read and understand. Effective use of headings and sub-headings.
Good
Mostly clear, logical progression, a few parts hard to follow. Good use of headings and sub-headings.
Fair
Inconsistent clarity, gaps in logical development, overall hard to follow. Decent use of headings and sub-headings.
Poor
Lack of organization, incoherent development and/or unreadable. Poor use, or not using headings and sub-headings.
Sentence Structure
10 %
Grammar, spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and
Excellent
Consistently clear & proper use of technical language. No spelling or grammar mistakes.
Good
A few errors that do not impair meaning or clarity much. 1-3 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Fair
Many errors that affect writing clarity or meaning. 4-8 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Poor
Consistently poor and unclear use of language; errors impair meaning. More than 8 spelling and/or grammar mistakes.
Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagram
10 %
Excellent
Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts, etc are very organized, detailed & relevant.
Good
Some Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts, etc are not labeled properly or relevant.
Fair
Some Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts, etc are not labeled, illustrated properly and/or relevant.
Poor
No labels, no text references, undefined symbols, and/or unreadable. No use of Figures, Equations, Tables, Diagrams, Plots, Charts etc.
Literature Cited
10 %
Excellent
Lots of very applicable, well formatted citations.
Good
Several good, well formatted and applicable citations.
Fair
Several citations included, but vaguely relate and are poorly cited.
Poor
Very few, and any that are included are incorrectly cited or irrelevant to topic.
Title & Introduction
10 %
Excellent
The title is clear and well connected to the task. The introduction is inviting, states the main aspect of the task, and encourages the reader to complete the task. Introduction ties back to project proposal.
Good
The title is clear and well connected to the task. The introduction clearly states the main aspect of the task but does not particularly encourage the reader to engage in the task. Introduction ties back to project proposal.
Fair
The title is present but is not well connected to the task. The introduction is not well connected to the task nor is it particularly inviting to the reader. Introduction does not tie back to project proposal.
Poor
There is no title and no clear introduction of the main aspect of the task.
Discussion and Conclusions
40 %
Excellent
Presents logical discussions, describes well why various conclusions occur, and is done succinctly with few words, great clarity and reasoning presented.
Good
Presents logical explanations and findings and addresses some of the questions, not overly wordy.
Fair
Some discussion and conclusions, but findings are incorrect, poorly structured and worded, missing fundamental concepts and relationships and is very verbose - yet says little.
Poor
Missing or only provides an illogical explanation of findings and does not or incorrectly address the questions in the introduction.
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.