iRubric: Response to Literature rubric

The scholar's response does not demonstrate critical thought about the text. Scholar's response is a retell with no ideas about the book. May or may not restate and/or answer questions. (1pt.)

The scholar's response demonstrates a surface level of thought about the text. Scholar may or may not fully restate and answer questions. (2pts.)

Scholar's response has all ideas present. Scholar's restate and answer the question. (3pts.)

Scholar's response demonstrates a deeper thought about the text. Scholar's response has all ideas present. Scholar's restate and answer the question. (4pts.)

Scholar's response do not include details from the text to support their thinking about the text. (1pt.)

Scholar's response include few details that support their thinking about the text. (2pts.)

Scholar's response include some details that support their thinking about the text. (3pts.)

Scholar's responses include multiple details that support their thinking about the text. (4pts.)

Writing is not formed in complete sentences and shows no indentations to form paragraphs. Punctuation is inconsistent or not present. (1pt.)

Writing is formed in somewhat complete thoughts. Shows attempt to form paragraphs and inconsistently uses punctuation. (2pts.)

Writing is formed in complete thoughts. Shows attempt to form paragraphs and inconsistently uses punctuation. (3pts.)

Writing is formed in complete thoughts. Paragraphs are formed by indenting and punctuation is consistently used. (4pts.)