Skip to main content
iRubric: French Monuments Project rubric

iRubric: French Monuments Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
French Monuments Project 
You and your partner will be creating an online project on one arrondissement in Paris that you will be sharing with the class. You will work with Google Docs to show where your arrondissement is, the main attractions there, and pick one monument/attraction (each, so two total) that you will share with the class.
Rubric Code: JX25W9X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric French Monument Project
  Needs work

4 pts

Fair

6 pts

Good

8 pts

Great

10 pts

Speaking

Needs work

-Presentation is less than 1:30 minutes long.
-used 3x5 card to read.
-The presenter mumbles, does not maintain eye contact.
-Mispronounces more than 4-5 words, could be the same word multiple times.
Fair

-Presentation is less than 2 minutes long (total).
-Might leave out some relevant information.
-Mispronounces 3 or more words.
-Might forget to maintain eye contact at some point during the presentation.
-Glances more than once to read text off of slide presentation.
--No paper reference is used.
Good

-Presentation is two to three minutes long (total).
-Includes all relevant information.
-The presenter speaks clearly and maintains good eye contact.
-May mispronounce 2-3 words.
-The presenter is not reading text from the screen.
--No paper reference is used.
Great

-Presentation is more than three minutes long (total).
-Includes all relevant information, plus an additional point of interest.
-The presenter speaks clearly and maintains good eye contact, and pronounces all words correctly.
-The presenter is not reading text from the screen.
-No paper reference is used.
Written portion

Needs work

-Google Document is less than one page, or incomplete.
-Partner did majority of work.
-Rough draft and/or edits turned in late.
-Not ready on due date.
Fair

-Google Document is one page or less, or not in the correct format (Times New Roman, size 12 font, double spaced,).
-Paper includes 3 or more typographical or grammatical errors.
-Sources are not correctly cited in MLA format.
-One or both partners may have completed rough draft/edits late.
Good

- Google Document meets length requirements and is typed in the correct format.
-Sources are correctly cited.
-There may be fewer than 3 typographical or grammatical errors.
-Both partners completed rough draft and edits on time.
-Both partners were prepared the day of their presentation.
Great

-Google Document meets all length requirements and is typed in the correct format.
-Sources are correctly cited, and there are NO typographical or grammatical errors.
-Both partners completed rough draft and edits on time.
-Both partners were prepared the day of their presentation.
Presentation

Needs work

-More than 10 words are used per slide.
-There are more than 4 spelling mistakes on the slides.
-Background is dark or textured and text is light.
-Animations/
transitions are used in an inconsistent way (too many animations/transitions with no point).
-Images may have watermarks.
-Images may be pixelated.
-Viewers may have trouble seeing the images.
-Group has no "back up plan" in case of technical issues.
Fair

-More than 8 words are used per slide.
-There are more than 3 spelling mistakes on the slides.
-Background is dark and text is light.
-Animations/
transitions are used in an inconsistent way (too many animations/transitions with no point).
-Images may have watermarks.
-Images may be pixelated.
-Viewers may have trouble seeing the images.
-Group has no "back up plan" in case of technical issues.
Good

-Text is used sparingly (8 words or less per slide), and mainly to label images.
-There are 2-3 spelling mistakes on the slides.
-Background is light and text is dark and sans serif
-Animations/
transitions are used in a consistent way to help emphasize an image or some text.
-Images have no watermarks.
-Images are not pixelated.
-Images are large enough for viewers to see from the back of the room.
-Group has a tech "back up plan".
Great

-Text is used sparingly (6 words or less per slide), and mainly to label images.
-There are no (or minor) spelling mistakes on the slides.
-Background is light and text is dark and sans serif
-Animations/
transitions are used in a consistent way to help emphasize an image or some text.
-Images have no watermarks.
-Images are not pixelated.
-Images are large enough for viewers to see from the back of the room.
-Has a tech "back up" plan.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232