Skip to main content
iRubric: BPSGT Look-A-Like rubric

iRubric: BPSGT Look-A-Like rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
BPSGT Look-A-Like 
Build a famous building out of everyday objects. You must choose your objects carefully and creatively so they have the look of the architectural feature which you are trying to replicate. Your Look-A-Like must also include appropriate landscaping and be accompanied by a picture of the building you are trying to recreate (citations are a must!) Please refer to examples contained in the various Look-A-Like books by Joy Steiner.
Rubric Code: JCW747
By sderrig
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric BPSGT Look-A-Like
  EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

5 pts

EXEMPLARY

4 pts

GOOD

3 pts

FAIR

2 pts

UNACCEPTABLE

1 pts

DID NOT COMPLETE

0 pts

DRAWING

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes at least 6 architectural features with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.
GOOD

Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 4-5 architectural features with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.
FAIR

Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 2-3 architectural features with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.
UNACCEPTABLE

Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 1 architectural feature with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Lack of neatness and accuracy make this drawing illegible. No architectural features are labeled. Missing a picture with citations for reference.
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Constructed a famous building with at least 6 architectural features.
GOOD

Constructed a famous building with 4-5 architectural features.
FAIR

Constructed a famous building with at 2-3 architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE

Constructed a famous building with 1 architectural feature.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Did not choose an appropriate building.
MATERIALS

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Appropriate materials were selected and used creatively to demonstrate architectural features.
GOOD

Appropriate materials were selected and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate architectural features.
FAIR

Few appropriate materials were selected and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE

Inappropriate materials were selected and contributed to a product which looked inaccurate.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Inappropriate materials were selected. No evidence of creativity.
LANDSCAPING

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and used to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape for the building.
GOOD

Appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape for the building.
FAIR

Few appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape for the building.
UNACCEPTABLE

Inappropriate materials were selected and contributed to a product which looked inaccurate.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Landscaping was not evident.
QUALITY

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Great care was taken in the construction process so that the building is neat, attractive, and follows plan accurately.
GOOD

Construction was careful and accurate for the most part, but 1-2 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.
FAIR

Construction accurately followed the drawing, but 3-4 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.
UNACCEPTABLE

Construction appears careless or haphazard. Many details need refinement for a strong or attractive product.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Insufficient quality evidenced in incomplete or ineffective construction.
PRESENTATION

DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY

Well rehearsed and appropriate voice level. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
GOOD

Prepared, but could benefit from rehearsal or voice projection. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
FAIR

Poorly prepared and/or unable to identify architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE

It is apparent that student did not rehearse the presentation prior to class.
DID NOT COMPLETE

Student would not present.



Keywords:
  • architecture

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60