Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: BPSGT Look-A-Like rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
BPSGT Look-A-Like
Build a famous building out of everyday objects. You must choose your objects carefully and creatively so they have the look of the architectural feature which you are trying to replicate. Your Look-A-Like must also include appropriate landscaping and be accompanied by a picture of the building you are trying to recreate (citations are a must!) Please refer to examples contained in the various Look-A-Like books by Joy Steiner.
Rubric Code:
JCW747
By
sderrig
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
BPSGT Look-A-Like
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
5 pts
EXEMPLARY
4 pts
GOOD
3 pts
FAIR
2 pts
UNACCEPTABLE
1 pts
DID NOT COMPLETE
0 pts
DRAWING
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes at least 6 architectural features with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.
GOOD
Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 4-5 architectural features with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.
FAIR
Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 2-3 architectural features with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.
UNACCEPTABLE
Drawing is neat, accurate, and includes 1 architectural feature with labels. A picture with citations is included for reference.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Lack of neatness and accuracy make this drawing illegible. No architectural features are labeled. Missing a picture with citations for reference.
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Constructed a famous building with at least 6 architectural features.
GOOD
Constructed a famous building with 4-5 architectural features.
FAIR
Constructed a famous building with at 2-3 architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE
Constructed a famous building with 1 architectural feature.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Did not choose an appropriate building.
MATERIALS
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Appropriate materials were selected and used creatively to demonstrate architectural features.
GOOD
Appropriate materials were selected and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate architectural features.
FAIR
Few appropriate materials were selected and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE
Inappropriate materials were selected and contributed to a product which looked inaccurate.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Inappropriate materials were selected. No evidence of creativity.
LANDSCAPING
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and used to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape for the building.
GOOD
Appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape for the building.
FAIR
Few appropriate materials were selected with accurate scale and there was an attempt to creatively demonstrate a matching landscape for the building.
UNACCEPTABLE
Inappropriate materials were selected and contributed to a product which looked inaccurate.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Landscaping was not evident.
QUALITY
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Great care was taken in the construction process so that the building is neat, attractive, and follows plan accurately.
GOOD
Construction was careful and accurate for the most part, but 1-2 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.
FAIR
Construction accurately followed the drawing, but 3-4 details could have been refined for a more attractive product.
UNACCEPTABLE
Construction appears careless or haphazard. Many details need refinement for a strong or attractive product.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Insufficient quality evidenced in incomplete or ineffective construction.
PRESENTATION
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Well rehearsed and appropriate voice level. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
GOOD
Prepared, but could benefit from rehearsal or voice projection. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
FAIR
Poorly prepared and/or unable to identify architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE
It is apparent that student did not rehearse the presentation prior to class.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Student would not present.
Keywords:
architecture
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.