Skip to main content
iRubric: Community Health Nursing rubric

iRubric: Community Health Nursing rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Community Health Nursing 
Paper 2 Community Health Nursing
Using a nursing theory of your choice, and your personal spirituality develop a professional plan that will guide a novice nurse’s practice in a specific Community Health setting (public health nurse, occupational health nurse, parish nurse, etc.). Be sure to describe the specific area of nursing you have chosen and describe what it will take to be successful. Each of the listed areas must be thoroughly addressed. 5-7 pages.
Rubric Code: JBB264
By mjewell
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Nursing  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Community Health Nursing
Examine and explain a community health nurse setting
  Below Expectations

3 pts

Meets Expectations

6 pts

Exceeds Expectations

8 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Scholarly standards

Lists goals of the paper with pertinent details. Then discuss ethical considerations to apply. Assignments should reflect an adequate knowledge of the topic, an understanding of underlying principles, synthesis of content, and interpretation of the subject with creative thought.
Below Expectations

Substantial
inaccuracies in
use of the references and understanding of the content. Elaboration
of evidence is
insufficient or not
understandable to
the reader.
Basically, an opinion<BR>
paper with faulty<BR>
descriptors. Does not follow in a
logical format.
Difficult for the
reader to
understand what
points are opinion
and what points are
supportive. Does not
convey organized
Meets Expectations

Doesn't fully<BR>
address other<BR>
viewpoints and/or<BR>
doesn't clarify own<BR>
views. Writer's<BR>
perspective is<BR>
acceptable, but not<BR>
easy to follow. Attempts to follow<BR>
logical format, but<BR>
wonders from one<BR>
concept to another<BR>
without clear flow or<BR>
rational. Thoughts<BR>
are not well<BR>
organized.
Exceeds Expectations

Elaborates on resources for building a successful career in community health nursing, but does
not clarify or
support own views.
Writer's perspective
is acceptable but not
sequentially
formatted. Attempts to follow
logical format, but
with less
consistency. Flow of
paper may result in
confusion between
writer's opinions and
supported,
evidenced-based
reports.
Excellent

Elaborates fully on topic clearly laying out a successful career path in an area of CHN, professional sources. Has defined the concepts discussed, used the required resources, and uses clear and effective examples. Answers the questions: What is my selected CHN career? Does what I say make a clear career path? Can readers discern my opinions from the evidence used to support them? Shows relevance for a successful career that incorporates ethics, spirituality, theory, and a specific area of CHN.
Originality

All assignments are expected to reflect original thoughts and interpretations of the information. Direct quotations should be kept to a minimum and used only when they enhance the message you are trying to convey. The topic posed is only part of the total. Does student find interesting angles from which to explore? All assignments are expected to reflect original thoughts and interpretations of the information.
Below Expectations

Much of the paper is copied from other sources, no original work is evident. Direct quotations<BR>
exceed 20%. Fails<BR>
to raise any<BR>
important questions<BR>
related to the topic<BR>
assigned. Does not<BR>
meet the criteria of<BR>
the assignment.
Meets Expectations

Direct quotations<BR>
are between<BR>
10-15%. Raises<BR>
questions related to<BR>
the topic, but may<BR>
not provide reader<BR>
with adequate<BR>
evidence for why<BR>
these additional<BR>
questions should be<BR>
considered.
Exceeds Expectations

Direct quotations<BR>
are between 5-10%.<BR>
Raises important<BR>
questions relevant<BR>
to the assigned<BR>
topic, and answers<BR>
them with evidence<BR>
from professional<BR>
sources.
Excellent

Less than 5% direct<BR>
quotations and they<BR>
are only used to raise<BR>
important questions<BR>
relevant to the<BR>
assigned topic and<BR>
clearly make a point.
Proper Grammar

All assignments are expected to meet minimum standards for proper English. This means that grammar, mechanics, punctuation, spelling and sentence structure should all be checked carefully by the student prior to submission. Spell check and grammar check are useful, but will not catch everything. Does the student use resources available to ensure grammatical and structural accuracy of the paper?
Below Expectations

Writing mechanics,<BR>
word usage,<BR>
grammar and<BR>
spelling contain<BR>
many errors that do<BR>
effect the paper's<BR>
content.
Meets Expectations

Multiple errors, but<BR>
they do not<BR>
substantially distract<BR>
from the content.
Exceeds Expectations

Writing mechanics,<BR>
word usage,<BR>
grammar and<BR>
spelling contains few<BR>
errors that mostly<BR>
do not effect the<BR>
paper's content.
Excellent

Writing mechanics,<BR>
word usage,<BR>
grammar and<BR>
spelling contain<BR>
minimal errors that<BR>
do not effect the<BR>
paper's content.
Format

All assignments should include a cover page that has your name, date, course number, assignment name and title. Listed page lengths for assignments are for the body of the paper only (do not count cover or reference pages).
Below Expectations

More than 5 APA<BR>
format issues.
Meets Expectations

More than 3 APA
format issues
Exceeds Expectations

Minor<BR>
APA format issues.
Excellent

Follows APA format.
References

In all assignments, students are expected to appropriate cite the sources of ideas, facts, and quotations using the American Psychological Association's (APA) Manual of Style. A minimum of 10 references must be used and the textbooks may not be used as sources. Does student demonstrate the proper use of citations and proper reference page?
Below Expectations

No professional<BR>
sources used or<BR>
cited, and/or come<BR>
from an unreliable<BR>
source. Much of<BR>
paper is copied from<BR>
sources, no original<BR>
work is evident. The references are not all from reliable sources, such as Wikipedia and 3 or fewer are peer reviewed.
Meets Expectations

Use of professional<BR>
sources without a<BR>
thoughtful summary<BR>
as to why the<BR>
sources are relevant<BR>
or how they enter<BR>
into writer's<BR>
discussion/critique. The references are not all from reliable sources, such as Wikipedia.
Exceeds Expectations

Excellent reliability<BR>
of professional<BR>
sources. Use of<BR>
source information<BR>
within the paper is<BR>
effective and<BR>
necessary. Has less that 10 references and more than half all not peer reviewed, but are reputable and reliable sources.
Excellent

Excellent reliability of<BR>
professional sources.<BR>
Use of source<BR>
information within<BR>
the paper is effective<BR>
and necessary.<BR>
Follows APA format. Has 10 or more references with the majority being peer reviewed journals.



Keywords:
  • critique, ethics

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202